Teams

15 WO Garnett/Stringer

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-18vs 11 SCC Diel/NickelWon 40
W#1 DoublesLiz Benedetti / Heather Drew vs Morgan Schwartz / Tracy Diel6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesZinie Sampson vs Avery Horgan6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Garnett / Anne-Marie Anderson vs Carla Shaffer / BRANDY NICKEL7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSule Sauvigne / Ainsley Crowell vs Katie Gilbert / Susan Hicklin6-1, 6-2
2025-07-16vs 5 Hermitage Stinson/BerentsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMorgan Hutter / Sallie Mayer vs Kimberly Ross / Beth Stinson5-7, 5-7
2025-07-11vs 3 ACAC-Hoefer/NaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Vetter / Sallie Mayer vs Carol Pfeiffer / Trisha Smith6-1, 6-2
2025-06-18vs 4 TDC SpillareSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Garnett / Melissa Berrey vs Erica Bragg / Kaitlin Marschke6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Jiulianti vs Patricia Hogan6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeredith Miles / Ainsley Crowell vs Stephanie Marcus / Sharon Moorefield4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSule Sauvigne / Jennifer Burris vs Kim Spillare / Meigan Sullivan6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Morgan Hutter
published
3.42
Heather Drew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.37
Sallie Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Melissa Berrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jenny Norfleet
published
3.27
Melissa Jiulianti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Jennifer Burris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Elizabeth Garnett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Ainsley Crowell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Anne-Marie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Meredith Miles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Zinie Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Benedetti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Mangin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Vetter + Heather Drew2356% games−0.3% vs expected
Anne-Marie Anderson + Jennifer Burris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Morgan Hutter
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Heather Drew
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sallie Mayer
85W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Melissa Berrey
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jenny Norfleet
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Melissa Jiulianti
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Burris
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Elizabeth Garnett
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Ainsley Crowell
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Anne-Marie Anderson
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Meredith Miles
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Liz Benedetti
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.