Teams

IRMSL/Wells/65&Over8.0W

2025 IRMSL Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women FriD

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-21vs Boulevard/BerkWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Haman / Kathleen Bourret vs MARGARETTA ANDREWS / Deborah Murphy6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Strong / Barbara Wells vs Mary Bowman / Anita Venner6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Grace Pillari vs Claudia Berk / Lauren Kushner6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-14vs Boulevard/BerkWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Strong / Anna Haman vs Lauren Kushner / Linda Miller6-1, 6-0
2025-02-28vs Boulevard/BerkWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnna Haman / Rebecca Fulper vs Claudia Berk / Anita Venner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Strong / Grace Pillari vs Sharon Milliman / Terri Blando6-0
2025-02-14vs Boulevard/BerkLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bourret / Rebecca Fulper vs Linda Miller / Lorraine Paxson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-07vs Boulevard/BerkLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Anna Haman vs Lorraine Paxson / Patty Raby2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Strong / Barbara Wells vs Claudia Berk / Nancy Nitardy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-31vs Boulevard/BerkWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Anna Haman vs Deborah Murphy / Sue Davis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-17vs Boulevard/BerkWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Anna Haman vs Lorraine Paxson / MARGARETTA ANDREWS7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women FriD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Carolyn Strong
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Anna Haman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Elizabeth Froehling
published
Grace Pillari
published
Mary Murray
published
Rebecca Fulper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Fulper + Anna Haman5647% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Fulper + Carolyn Strong314 matchesnot enough data
Anna Haman + Carolyn Strong224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Strong
131W–68L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Anna Haman
34W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Elizabeth Froehling
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Grace Pillari
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Murray
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Fulper
61W–61L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.