← Teams

MAC-Orban/Kallgren

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Mariniah Prendergast
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.11
Trina Denson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Jennifer Devoe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Cynthia McPhee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Stacy Hawkins Parker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.95
Amy Leahy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Lisa Handley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Terri Pickard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results7 ties
2022-11-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Leahy / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Lisa Lyon / Cathy Porter6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia McPhee / Jennifer Devoe vs Carla Wheeler / Margaret Sivertsen6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Go / Terri Pickard vs Takumi Koyama / Flor Harrigan6-3, 6-3
2022-11-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesShannon Dilorenzo / Mariniah Prendergast vs Chiho Cronk / Michelle Donato6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Layne / Cynthia McPhee vs Sue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Lisa Handley vs Sarah Morris / Rebecca Redding4-6, 4-2
2022-11-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMariniah Prendergast / Shannon Dilorenzo vs Carol Woolman / Lisa Gray6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCynthia McPhee / Lisa Handley vs Sandy Garry / Janet Tabor6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Leahy / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Marie Picard / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShannon Dilorenzo / Jennifer Devoe vs Shannon Fraser / June Wu6-1, 7-5
2022-10-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMariniah Prendergast / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Jill Sather / Tami Oglesby6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCynthia McPhee / Trina Denson vs Deborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGay Hart / Lisa Handley vs Cindy Rushall / Nenette Olson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAmy Leahy / Mariniah Prendergast vs Angie Lee / Karen Dellinger6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Pickard / Catherine Go vs Cathy Porter / Lisa Lyon6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Kallgren / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Flor Harrigan / Donna Kennish6-1, 6-3
2022-10-01Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesTrina Denson / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Kim Hill / Carol Woolman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMariniah Prendergast / Catherine Go vs Linda Anderson / Kimberly Quach6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Mariniah Prendergast
52W–33L career
3%96%0%
4.13
4.5
Trina Denson
46W–18L career
8%92%1%
4.11
4.5
Jennifer Devoe
31W–20L career
12%86%1%
4.09
4.5
Cynthia McPhee
38W–30L career
8%91%0%
4.08
4.5
Stacy Hawkins Parker
58W–55L career
8%92%0%
4.06
4.5
Amy Leahy
73W–57L career
27%73%0%
3.95
4.5
Lisa Handley
41W–32L career
56%44%0%
3.84
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
4
Terri Pickard
44W–44L career
52%48%0%
3.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.