Teams

Ivory Ridge-Gayle

2023 USTA Mixed 40 & Over · mixed 6.0 40 & over

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-01vs Liberty Park Tennis-Day/TorresWon 21
L#1 DoublesRyan Ross / Camille Ross vs Emilee Hurley / Endhi Visser3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth West / Ray West vs Elaine Day / Wayne Day3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCara Larson / Rob Riley vs Michael Fordham / Jennifer Wecker6-3, 6-3
2023-03-25vs Liberty Park Tennis-HatchWon 30
W#1 DoublesGaylynn Gale / Rob Riley vs Carlie van Alfen / Craig van Alfen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth West / Ray West vs Sarah Love / John Love6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShellie Black / Jon Black vs Paula Kremser / Trent Anderson6-4, 6-2
2023-03-10vs Sports Mall-Henderson/WalljasperLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth West / Ray West vs Jeremiah Bradley / Nancy Miller0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShellie Black / Jon Black vs Erin Bradley / Mark Miller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaulette Santiago / Mark Santiago vs DeeAnn Henderson / Shawn Tooley1-6, 2-6
2023-03-03vs Liberty Park Tennis-Day/TorresSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGaylynn Gale / Kurt Gale vs Diane Poole / Fernando Torres2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCara Larson / Rob Riley vs Jeff Petersen / Sara Ray6-4, 6-4
2023-02-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-HatchWon 21
W#1 DoublesKurt Gale / Gaylynn Gale vs Randy Thurgood / CarolLynne Thurgood6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRyan Ross / Camille Ross vs Kenneth Marz / Inga Nelson1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPaulette Santiago / Mark Santiago vs Sandy Weeks / John Love6-0, 6-3
2023-02-04vs Salt Lake Tennis-OstranderLost 03
L#1 DoublesRob Riley / Gaylynn Gale vs Greg Ostrander / Betsy Ostrander5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCara Larson / Scott Larson vs Mark Follette / Stef Charlesworth0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaulette Santiago / Mark Santiago vs Jay Permenter / LISA PERMENTER4-6, 5-7
2023-02-03vs Salt Lake Tennis-OstranderLost 03
L#1 DoublesCamille Ross / Ryan Ross vs Marilee Cracroft / Tod Cracroft1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGaylynn Gale / Kurt Gale vs Stef Charlesworth / Dan Murray6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCara Larson / Scott Larson vs Nicole Leatham / Brian Smith1-6, 0-6
2023-01-28vs Sports Mall-Henderson/WalljasperLost 03
L#1 DoublesJon Black / Shellie Black vs Arunnatesh Muthukkumaraswamy / Kristen Logan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Ross / Camille Ross vs Ryan Farr / Yoko Walljasper1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Santiago / Paulette Santiago vs DeeAnn Henderson / Eli Troy Mills1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · mixed 6.0 40 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Henderson/Walljasper802226110
2Salt Lake Tennis-Ostrander6215923191
3Liberty Park Tennis-Day/Torres35121226195
4Ivory Ridge-Gayle3581633245
5Liberty Park Tennis-Hatch0832143274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Mark Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Camille Ross
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Paulette Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Shellie Black
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Gaylynn Gale
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.23
Cara Larson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Elizabeth West
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jon Black
published
Kurt Gale
published
Ray West
published
Ryan Ross
published
Scott Larson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gaylynn Gale + Kurt Gale8950% gamesnot enough data
Camille Ross + Ryan Ross21531% gamesnot enough data
Shellie Black + Jon Black7946% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth West + Ray West7356% gamesnot enough data
Paulette Santiago + Mark Santiago134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Santiago
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Camille Ross
41W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Paulette Santiago
60W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Shellie Black
99W–146L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Gaylynn Gale
110W–124L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Cara Larson
35W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.23
Elizabeth West
86W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Black
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kurt Gale
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ray West
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Ross
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Larson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.