Teams

65+Hill24

2024 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-17vs SchniederWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteve Newcomer / Richard Snader vs Joseph Touzin / Thomas Schneider6-2, 6-0
2024-07-10vs SchniederLost 01
L#2 DoublesFrank Burnett / Duane Gillen vs George Rigler / Allen Boetig6-7, 2-6
2024-07-03vs SchniederSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteven Hill / Steve Newcomer vs Thomas Schneider / Walter Parrish6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRichard Snader / Dennis Weikel vs Allen Boetig / Joseph Touzin4-6, 2-6
2024-06-19vs SchniederLost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard Snader / Steve Newcomer vs Jim Slaughter / Richard White4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHank Hudson / Frank Burnett vs William Bloomquist / George Rigler7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-12vs SchniederLost 02
L#1 DoublesHank Hudson / Frank Burnett vs Michael Stevens / John Solberg2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Hill / Dennis Weikel vs Jim Slaughter / Richard White6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-05vs SchniederSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Newcomer / Steven Hill vs Michael Stevens / Jim Slaughter6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Patterson / Frank Burnett vs William Dodd / Richard White2-6, 2-6
2024-05-29vs SchniederWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Snader / Steve Newcomer vs Robert Duckman / William Bloomquist6-4, 6-2
2024-05-22vs SchniederLost 01
L#1 DoublesFrank Burnett / Philip Dales vs Robert Duckman / William Bloomquist1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Steve Newcomer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Dennis Weikel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Frank Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Joseph Mayer
published
Mike Patterson
published
Paul Devlin
published
Richard Amos
published
Richard Snader
published
Steven Hill
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Steve Newcomer
190W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Frank Burnett
72W–114L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.04
Joseph Mayer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Patterson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Devlin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Amos
0W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Snader
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Hill
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.