Teams

5.TOHS.Finn

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-11vs 1.MD.LigaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesDana Frazier vs Angie Bostrom5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Finn / Stephanie Charlino vs Jennifer Alviano / Meredith Heath7-5, 6-0
2022-05-04vs 2.PW.BologaLost 02
L#2 SinglesRobin Finn vs Katherine Kelly2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Frazier / Mahek Thakkar vs Ronna Yates / Emily Haverstick1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-09vs 4.TOC.LeippeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMahek Thakkar / Dana Frazier vs Adna Rubio / Lauren Redmond4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Charlino vs Skylar Poole1-6, 5-7
2022-04-03vs 3.TOC.FeltenWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobin Finn / Stephanie Charlino vs Jessica Brehmer / Emily Yang6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-29vs 3.TOC.FeltenSplit 11
W#1 SinglesStephanie Charlino vs Najia Cheema6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlix Miller / Robin Finn vs Sachiko Kuzume / Jessica Brehmer2-6, 2-6
2022-03-26vs 1.MD.LigayLost 01
L#2 SinglesRobin Finn vs Katherine Henry1-6, 2-6
2022-03-19vs 2.PW.BologaLost 12
W#1 SinglesStephanie Charlino vs Diana Kwiatek6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShannon Kurtz / Dana Frazier vs Sarah Burkey / Susan Ramirez3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRobin Finn vs Erin Horne3-6, 6-7
2022-03-05vs 4.TOC.LeippeLost 02
L#1 SinglesDana Frazier vs Abigail Weaver5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Condon / Robin Finn vs Amanda Mueller / Bladen Leippe2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Stephanie Charlino
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.92
Dana Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Jennifer Hellrung
published
2.77
Robin Finn
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3
Anne Grimm
published 3
2.71
Dana Briggs
published 3
2.71
2.50
Kelli Moore
published
Glynda Westerbeek
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephanie Charlino
83W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3
Dana Frazier
126W–125L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Jennifer Hellrung
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Robin Finn
106W–142L career · 11 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne Grimm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Dana Briggs
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Jessenia Delos Santos
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Kelli Moore
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Glynda Westerbeek
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.