Teams

Su.Starnes40S

2024 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-20vs He.McCann40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesLiz Arcos vs Jeannette Walker7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Maureen Doherty1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-12vs Je.Wolborsky40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLiz Arcos vs Jennifer Wolborsky6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Jill Dykes4-6
2024-06-22vs Da.Rusnak40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Amy Cagle0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesLiz Arcos vs Jade Paunovich6-1, 6-1
2024-06-15Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Bladen Leippe6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Maureen Doherty6-1, 6-4
2024-05-25vs Da.Rusnak40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Amy Cagle0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Amy Hobbs
published 3.5
3.44
Liz Arcos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Redmond
published
3.10
Paige Alford
published 3.5
2.76
Rossana Prevost
published 3
2.68
Ana Maria Allessi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.57
Susan Starnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Arcos + Amy Hobbs6359% games−0.3% vs expected
Paige Alford + Amy Hobbs404 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Redmond + Amy Hobbs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Hobbs
52W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Liz Arcos
193W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
Lauren Redmond
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Paige Alford
121W–136L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Rossana Prevost
54W–61L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Ana Maria Allessi
80W–86L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Susan Starnes
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.