Teams

LTYC - May

2023 USTA 70 & Over League · Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-20Won 20
W#2 DoublesMary Alspach / Sadie High vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesA Lucille Meissner / Margaret Weik vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-19vs Hershey CC - SeiverlingLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Witmer / Amber Kroh vs Virginia Lowe / Terri Mrozinski6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Weik / Bonnie Nolt vs Sue Myers / Sharon McTavish5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-17vs Hershey - EvangelistaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmber Kroh / Mary Alspach vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBonnie Nolt / Margaret Weik vs Cindy Rohrbaugh / Gayeta Porter6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJessica May / Lucile Longo vs Linda Dolfi / Jackie Evangelista6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-12vs Hershey CC - SeiverlingWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Kroh / Susan Rebert vs Sue Myers / Donna Bauserman7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesA Lucille Meissner / Margaret Weik vs Nancy Yohn / Sharon McTavish6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSadie High / Elaine Rostolsky vs Darlis Simonton / Patricia Jenkins6-0, 6-2
2023-10-02vs Hershey - EvangelistaWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Witmer / Amber Kroh vs Paula Huntzinger / Cindy Rohrbaugh4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Weik / A Lucille Meissner vs Sharon Williams / Sheila Lampel7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Alspach / Sadie High vs Gayeta Porter / Linda Dolfi6-3, 7-5
2023-09-07vs Hershey - EvangelistaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Rebert / Julia Levering vs Paula Huntzinger / Sharon Williams6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Gleiberman / Mary Alspach vs Gayeta Porter / Cindy Rohrbaugh3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Weik / Elaine Rostolsky vs Jackie Evangelista / Linda Dolfi6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTYC - May5112613115
2Hershey - Evangelista2481024177
3Hershey CC - Seiverling2471126177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Amber Kroh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Bonnie Nolt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Julia Levering
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Susan Rebert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Jessica May
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
A Lucille Meissner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Linda Witmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Elaine Rostolsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Mary Alspach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Carol Gleiberman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Lucile Longo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Margaret Weik
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Sadie High
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Rebert + Linda Witmer151052% games−2.9% vs expected
Bonnie Nolt + Margaret Weik41138% games−8.8% vs expected
Susan Rebert + Margaret Weik9953% gamesnot enough data
Linda Witmer + Margaret Weik5449% gamesnot enough data
Mary Alspach + Margaret Weik6352% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Rostolsky + Sadie High5257% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Rostolsky + Margaret Weik3445% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Nolt + Elaine Rostolsky4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Kroh
193W–180L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Bonnie Nolt
116W–198L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Julia Levering
35W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Susan Rebert
116W–143L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jessica May
65W–80L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
A Lucille Meissner
29W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Linda Witmer
100W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Elaine Rostolsky
110W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Mary Alspach
83W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Carol Gleiberman
17W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Lucile Longo
14W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
Margaret Weik
93W–134L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sadie High
55W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.