Teams

JBTC - Sanborn

2025 Duval Adult 65 & Over - Men · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-18vs ABTC ColemanLost 12
L#1 DoublesM Delahunty / Myles Donaldson vs Robert Schiavone / Larry Restieri3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHendrik Strydom / David Haynes vs William Romond / Jeffrey Oakley6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJim Young / Thomas Hack vs Mark Wiley / William Shetler5-7, 4-6
2025-03-11vs Ponte Vedra - RotheWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Chau / Thomas Hack vs Christopher HARRIS / George Norton1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRick Sanborn / Hendrik Strydom vs William Prescott / Hank Holbrook6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJim Young / M Delahunty vs Jeff Rothe / Steve Burns6-3, 7-6
2025-03-04vs Duval/Royal/65&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesRon Hartsfield / Hendrik Strydom vs Butch Reese / Dale Musslewhite1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMyles Donaldson / Jim Hills vs David Delaney / Lyle Hursey1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJim Young / M Delahunty vs Richard McLaughlin / Charles Patterson6-3, 7-5
2025-03-03vs Marsh Creek - HolubWon 30
W#1 DoublesRon Hartsfield / David Haynes vs Tim Anderson / Ed Dodson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRick Sanborn / George Hansen vs Frank Clark / John Hannah6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesThomas Hack / Nolan Bomar vs Steve Shambach / John Lobo5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-11vs ABTC ColemanLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorge Hansen / Rick Sanborn vs Larry Restieri / Robert Schiavone3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHendrik Strydom / David Haynes vs JOHN WALKER / Henry Sieminski6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Hills / Myles Donaldson vs William Shetler / William Romond0-6, 4-6
2025-02-04vs Ponte Vedra - RotheLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Haynes / M Delahunty vs Christopher HARRIS / George Norton3-6, 5-0
L#2 DoublesRon Hartsfield / Hendrik Strydom vs Jeff Rothe / Charles Wilson4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRick Sanborn / Jim Young vs John Hotes / George Bellino6-0, 6-1
2025-01-30vs Marsh Creek - HolubWon 30
W#1 DoublesRon Hartsfield / Hendrik Strydom vs Ed Dodson / Steve Shambach6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGeorge Hansen / Rick Sanborn vs Tim Anderson / John Hannah3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNolan Bomar / Thomas Hack vs Gary Holub / John Lobo2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
David Haynes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Charles McGehee
published 3.5
3.09
Thomas Hack
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
David Chau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
George Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Hendrik Strydom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Hills
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jim Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
M Delahunty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Myles Donaldson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nolan Bomar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Sanborn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Ron Hartsfield
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Young + Hendrik Strydom3640% gamesnot enough data
M Delahunty + David Haynes2355% gamesnot enough data
Rick Sanborn + George Hansen224 matchesnot enough data
Myles Donaldson + David Haynes123 matchesnot enough data
Rick Sanborn + M Delahunty123 matchesnot enough data
Nolan Bomar + Jim Young213 matchesnot enough data
David Haynes + Hendrik Strydom303 matchesnot enough data
Hendrik Strydom + Ron Hartsfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Haynes
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Charles McGehee
46W–55L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Hack
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
David Chau
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
George Hansen
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hendrik Strydom
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Hills
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Young
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
M Delahunty
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Myles Donaldson
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nolan Bomar
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rick Sanborn
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ron Hartsfield
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.