Teams

Cindy's Red Hots

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER · Ladies 3.0 - 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-01vs Marian's TeamWon 31
W#1 DoublesNancy Taylor / Shirley Moore vs Pennie Weir / Christel Walrath6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLaurie Hill vs Shay Howlin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPenny Wiseman / Sherry Aanenson vs Marian Grandbois / PAULINE DUNNUCK6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Adams / Annie Bergman vs Susan Day / Christine Mottl6-0, 6-1
2021-08-01vs Marian's TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Taylor / Penny Wiseman vs Shay Howlin / Marian Grandbois1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngelika Bridgmon / Laurie Hill vs PAULINE DUNNUCK / Christine Mottl6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Adams / Annie Bergman vs Susan Day / Christel Walrath6-1, 6-2
2021-07-17vs Marian's TeamWon 31
W#1 DoublesPenny Wiseman / Shirley Moore vs Shay Howlin / Christine Mottl6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAngelika Bridgmon vs Pennie Weir6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaurie Hill / Sherry Aanenson vs PAULINE DUNNUCK / Christel Walrath5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Adams / Annie Bergman vs Marian Grandbois / Susan Day6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Ladies 3.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cindy's Red Hots3084977
2Marian's Team034818132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Penny Wiseman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Shirley Moore
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Carol Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Laurie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.55
Angelika Bridgmon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Annie Bergman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Sherry Aanenson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Adams + Annie Bergman6653% games−6.5% vs expected
Shirley Moore + Penny Wiseman303 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Moore + Angelika Bridgmon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Wiseman
30W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
Shirley Moore
53W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carol Adams
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurie Hill
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
2.63
3
Angelika Bridgmon
12W–20L career · 6 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Annie Bergman
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Aanenson
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.