Teams

Kimble, Paul

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over-JXN · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-08vs Do, DawsonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMitch Evans / Jay Irving vs Hector Custode / Landon Black1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Kimble / Rahul Chaddha vs Jonathan Sims / Kellon Lawrence4-6, 4-5
2026-06-17vs Do, DawsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrad Boteler / Ryan Brister vs Dawson Do / Zackery Presnall2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRussell Dendy / Jay Irving vs Evans Henderson / Patrick Royals1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-27vs Do, DawsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Brister / Travis Ezelle vs Hector Custode / Joseph M Jabour3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJD Hosemann / Sourav Dutta vs Adam Byrd / Matt Thomas3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Boteler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.50
Paige Purvis
published
3.42
Russell Dendy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Mitch Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Nico Jimeno
published
3.35
JD Hosemann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jay Irving
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Paul Kimble
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Rahul Chaddha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Sourav Dutta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Michael Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mitchell Peters
published
Ryan Brister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Travis Ezelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JD Hosemann + Nico Jimeno4165% games+11.3% vs expected
Sourav Dutta + Jay Irving224 matchesnot enough data
Sourav Dutta + Rahul Chaddha033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Boteler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Paige Purvis
40W–11L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Russell Dendy
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Mitch Evans
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Nico Jimeno
42W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
JD Hosemann
37W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Jay Irving
30W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Paul Kimble
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Rahul Chaddha
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Sourav Dutta
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Michael Collins
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Mitchell Peters
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Brister
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Travis Ezelle
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.