Teams

KY/PUR/HANELINE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER PURCHASE · 4.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.10 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-31vs KY/PUR/AMUNDSONLost 02
L#1 DoublesAudrey Lamb / Megan Null vs Kara Amundson / Kayla Davis7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCamron Blandford vs Soojin Kim1-6, 2-6
2025-05-29vs KY/PUR/AMUNDSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesAimee Ackermann / Karen Mueller vs Sara DeSanctis / Carmen Schreiber2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAudrey Lamb / Megan Null vs Kayla Davis / Kara Amundson6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnnie Smith / Missy Jeffers vs Hannah Hostetler / Sara Moore6-3, 6-1
2025-05-16vs KY/PUR/AMUNDSONLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Null / Audrey Lamb vs Kayla Davis / Kara Amundson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCamron Blandford vs Soojin Kim4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAimee Ackermann / Karen Mueller vs Sara Moore / Hannah Hostetler4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annie Smith
published 4.5
4.13
Missy Jeffers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Aimee Ackermann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Karen Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Audrey Lamb
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.71
Camron Blandford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Devin Haneline
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Megan Null
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Ackermann + Karen Mueller2548% games−12.8% vs expected
Audrey Lamb + Megan Null033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Annie Smith
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Missy Jeffers
20W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Aimee Ackermann
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Karen Mueller
32W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Audrey Lamb
3W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Camron Blandford
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Devin Haneline
17W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Megan Null
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.