← Teams

SAC-Leake/Hua

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Kristin Spear
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.95
Kristie Leake
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.82
Teresa Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Kaelin Teo
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.72
Sharon Kim-Geib
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Bo Yu
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 4
3.48
Molly Odonnell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Lyann Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Cathy Gatzke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-06-04Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesKristie Leake / Kristin Spear vs Michelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBo Yu vs Christina Wright6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Sullivan / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Sarah Townley / Michelle Dombek6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Diane Pittmon vs Dee Deggs / Gina Meyer7-5, 6-1
2022-05-22Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesMolly Odonnell vs Rebecca Jones6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristie Leake / Teresa Sullivan vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Kay Dobashi7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDiane Pittmon / Cathy Gatzke vs Cindy Speck / Robby Lafleur6-3, 6-4
2022-05-15Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesBo Yu vs Gina Ossanna6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristin Spear / Kristie Leake vs Jin Velasco / Courtney Storrs6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDiane Pittmon / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Gabriela McIntosh / Elizabeth Schwarz6-3, 6-1
2022-05-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKristie Leake / Teresa Sullivan vs Flor Harrigan / Takumi Koyama6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Spear vs Kelly Mohr7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSharon Kim-Geib / Molly Odonnell vs Angie Lee / Karen Dellinger6-4, 7-6
2022-05-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKristie Leake / Teresa Sullivan vs Kristi Vargas / Judith Kobin6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Kim-Geib / Kaelin Teo vs Nancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Pittmon / Molly Odonnell vs Adrienne VanBeckhoven / Jennifer Pancoast2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-01Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesBo Yu vs Leslie Jones6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristie Leake / Kristin Spear vs Denise Dawkins / Suzy Rylander6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Sharon Kim-Geib vs Annie Sumpter / Julie Carmena6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-30Lost 1–2
W#1 SinglesKristin Spear vs Katy Marcy6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Sullivan / Kaelin Teo vs Linda Lovett / Courtney Pierce7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristie Leake / Bo Yu vs Lisa Handley / Darci Keljo6-4, 7-6
2022-04-09Lost 1–2
W#1 SinglesBo Yu vs Tami McAra4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Kim-Geib / Diane Pittmon vs Kari Martin / Crystal Bryant6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMolly Odonnell / Lyann Nguyen vs Elda Nelson / Barbara Seatter7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kristin Spear
110W–39L career
3%97%0%
4.12
4.5
Kristie Leake
126W–83L career · type A
26%74%0%
3.95
4
Teresa Sullivan
112W–57L career
0%98%1%
3.82
4
Kaelin Teo
55W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Sharon Kim-Geib
76W–53L career
1%99%0%
3.72
4
Bo Yu
105W–180L career
4%96%0%
3.65
4
Molly Odonnell
37W–90L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Lyann Nguyen
59W–44L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Cathy Gatzke
53W–92L career
2%98%0%
3.19

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.