Teams

JMADIA

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-10vs IJSageWon 10
W#2 DoublesTom Larrichio / W Troutman vs Mark Camacho / John Wagner6-3, 6-2
2022-10-03vs JDiamond 8.5 comboWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Madia / Scott Riley vs Ken Lawton / Hai Le6-3, 6-4
2022-09-26vs JVanDeWater(55+ Combo)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRandy Lakey / Tom Larrichio vs Dayn Harum / Chris Saillant6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Madia / Scott Riley vs Ray Goldberg / Wes Talton6-3, 6-3
2022-09-19vs IJSageWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Faltz / Dirk German vs John Gearing / Joe Murphy6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTom Larrichio / W Troutman vs Wes Snead / Nile Testerman6-1, 6-1
2022-09-12vs IJSageWon 20
W#2 DoublesSteve Faltz / Dirk German vs Joe Murphy / Wes Snead6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Stevens / W Troutman vs John van Campen / Don Pittman6-3, 6-3
2022-08-29vs JVanDeWater(55+ Combo)Won 20
W#2 DoublesTom Larrichio / W Troutman vs Steven Miller / Chris Saillant6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Faltz / Dirk German vs Linh Nguyen / John VanDeWater6-1, 6-1
2022-08-16vs JVanDeWater(55+ Combo)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRandy Lakey / Tom Larrichio vs Steven Miller / Chris Saillant6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-08-15vs JDiamond 8.5 comboWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Faltz / Dirk German vs Tom Sparks / Scott Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Madia / W Troutman vs John Diamond / Ken Nowell6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Tom Larrichio
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.91
W Troutman
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Roger Kurtz
published
3.69
Scott Riley
published
3.67
Dirk German
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Jeffrey Madia
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Steve Faltz
published
Tom Stevens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Larrichio + W Troutman17265% games+2.1% vs expected
Tom Larrichio + Dirk German4259% gamesnot enough data
Tom Larrichio + Jeffrey Madia3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tom Larrichio
132W–95L career · 5 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
W Troutman
356W–116L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.91
Roger Kurtz
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Scott Riley
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dirk German
96W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Jeffrey Madia
92W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Steve Faltz
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Stevens
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.