Teams

DavidPark/Feder

2024 Broward Combo 18 & Over - Day · 8.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-18vs DaviPark/LevineWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Michele King vs Gricel Boto Bernales / Pauline Markowicz6-3, 6-2
2024-09-13vs Winner/Moll/18&Over8.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele King / AYelen Gragg vs Laura di Lauro / Sahar Moghaddam6-3, 3-2
2024-09-06vs Winner/Moll/18&Over8.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Michele King vs Natalia Moll / Romina Paludi7-6, 7-6
2024-08-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Conine / Katherine Shadid vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-26vs Winner/Moll/18&Over8.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Virginie Beaufrand vs Gloria Coursey / Rosana Fernandez6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Michele King vs Diana C Cardenas / Taciana Kalili6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-07-19vs DaviPark/LevineWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Rachel Seifer vs Hania Majzoub / Susie Valls6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Mathews / Katherine Shadid vs Patricia Vicente / Maria Brozzi7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
AYelen Gragg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Cindy Conine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Samie Lesperance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Laurie Mathews
published
4.03
Marci Feder
published
4.02
Michele King
published
4.02
Kimberly OMahony
published 4.5
3.85
Katherine Shadid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Rachel Seifer
published
3.71
Laura Mendelson
published
Kristina Avila
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

AYelen Gragg + Samie Lesperance7061% games+8.6% vs expected
Katherine Shadid + NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA4166% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Mathews + Marci Feder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AYelen Gragg
83W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
Cindy Conine
115W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Samie Lesperance
247W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Laurie Mathews
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Marci Feder
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Michele King
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Kimberly OMahony
77W–46L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Katherine Shadid
84W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Rachel Seifer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA
147W–107L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Laura Mendelson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Kristina Avila
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.