Teams

Processed

Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · Admin Area Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeaghan Chien / Kathleen Boaz vs April Blauser / Kim Taylor6-1, 6-1
2023-12-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesMeaghan Chien / Janis Buesching vs Judith Mowry / Melanie Puckett6-1, 6-4
2023-12-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHannah Fogle / Cindy Senseman vs Lauren Daniel / Katie Geik1-6, 1-6
2023-11-29Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Butler / Cindy Senseman vs Susan Wojcicki / Brooke Rundle3-6, 3-6
2023-11-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeaghan Chien / Janis Buesching vs Linda Cook / Linda Burwell7-5, 6-2
2023-10-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHannah Fogle / Cindy Senseman vs Lauren Daniel / Maureen Saul4-6, 1-6
2023-10-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRebeca House / Cindy Senseman vs Michelle Trotter / Kathy Collins0-6, 2-6
2023-10-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesJanis Buesching / Meaghan Chien vs Kim Taylor / Jo Fowler6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Admin Area Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Meaghan Chien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Amy Deckard
published 4
2.14
Cindy Senseman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Melissa Poindexter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meaghan Chien + Amy Deckard4644% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meaghan Chien
152W–158L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Amy Deckard
140W–139L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
2.5
Cindy Senseman
25W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Melissa Poindexter
20W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.