Teams

Chicks With Sticks

2025 Montgomery Doubles Winter Women · Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-10vs Arlington Crushes 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCindee Smith / Angela Ferguson vs Nicholina Ferramosca / Tori Gregorios2-6, 4-6
2025-04-03vs Norbeck Blue BellesLost 01
L#1 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Joanne Rome vs KATIE KELLY / Stephanie Hooker3-6, 2-6
2025-03-18vs Match Makers 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Horowitz / Gillian Moorhead vs Tamara Clarke / Cathy Pasquariello3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-06vs Franklin-BCC 3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoanne Rome / Jayne Korolkoff vs Melanie Wine / Jennifer Winston1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLeticia Romero Maineri / Linda Wimsatt vs Catherine Byrne / Ivey Castleberry6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Thomas / Kristen Moshyedi vs Laura O'Keefe / Amanda Franklin3-6, 4-6
2025-02-13vs Anything But NetLost 01
L#2 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Joanne Rome vs Annie Carey / Diana Talesnick0-3
2025-01-31vs Burns - Congressional 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeticia Romero Maineri / Cindee Smith vs Susan Marsh-Whicker / Rachel Burns6-1, 6-0
2025-01-16vs Girls Just Want to Have FunLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Rose / Linda Wimsatt vs Kimberly Hayman / Elizabeth Walsh3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJayne Korolkoff / Leticia Romero Maineri vs Margaret Cornelius / Michelle Grossman6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristen Moshyedi / Lisa Smith vs Kim Atkinson / Aoife Daly6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Cindee Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Jody Amann
published
3.34
Leticia Romero Maineri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.32
Gillian Moorhead
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Patricia Rose
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Sandy Horowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Joanne Rome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jayne Korolkoff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Angela Ferguson
published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Raker
published
2.98
Linda Wimsatt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristen Moshyedi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gillian Moorhead + Cindee Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Jayne Korolkoff + Joanne Rome123 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Rome + Leticia Romero Maineri303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindee Smith
49W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Jody Amann
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Leticia Romero Maineri
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Gillian Moorhead
168W–147L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Patricia Rose
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Joanne Rome
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Jayne Korolkoff
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angela Ferguson
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Lisa Raker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Linda Wimsatt
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Kristen Moshyedi
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.