Teams

Nguyen/18/3.5/NON/TTRc

2026 NO Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

19 players · average NTRP 3.42 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-27vs Charvat/18/3.5/NON/CPWon 41
W#1 DoublesLesley Davis / Nancy Decuers vs Melissa Maia / Josie Azuma6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBria Papia vs Elizabeth Charvat6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Marino / Alexandra Webre vs Lauren Templeman / Tessa Izdepski6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTameka Aych vs Dorie Delucca6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGwendolyn Ford / Valerie Moss Andrews vs Kristen Singer / Jenna Cappuccia6-0, 6-2
2026-04-21vs Morris/18/3.5/NON/XUSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNancy Decuers / Bria Papia vs Michele Spansel / Leslie Clark3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Matherne / Melanie Weisheit vs Laura Bernard / Harriet Landrieu6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesValerie Moss Andrews vs Mary Pugh1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTran Black / Amanda Mouton vs Jessica Barnett / Adrienne Duncan6-1, 6-3
2026-04-13vs Quast/18/3.5/NON/CPWon 41
W#1 DoublesDenise Ledet / Melanie Weisheit vs Molly Joubert / Stephanie Blakemore6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTameka Aych vs Adele Perino6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHelen Galloway-Newman / Amanda Mouton vs Molly Quast / Anna Stenger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesValerie Moss Andrews vs Meghan Stander3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTran Black / Mary Sullivan vs Goudeau Renee / Katie McKay6-0, 6-4
2026-04-06vs Allen/18/3.5/NON/ASTCWon 32
L#1 DoublesHelen Galloway-Newman / Mary Sullivan vs Julia Novack / Jaesoon Han6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTameka Aych vs Lydia Cutrer6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTran Black / Michelle Matherne vs Ashley Thomas / Amanda Tissue7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMelanie Weisheit vs Catherine Todd1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTrinh Do / Sara Lewis vs Stacey Arabie / Ji Kang7-6, 6-2
2026-03-23vs Teesdale/Fallahi/18/3.5/NON/CPWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmanda Mouton / Valerie Moss Andrews vs Rebekah Teesdale / Kim Bauer6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Marino vs Helen Graves7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Ledet / Mary Sullivan vs Susan Fallahi / Gretchen Douglas6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTameka Aych vs Natalie Mikhailov6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTrinh Do / Bria Papia vs Svetlana Crouch / Katy Finger3-6, 4-6
2026-03-02vs Perino/Martin/18/3.5/NON/CPWon 31
W#1 DoublesLesley Davis / Nancy Decuers vs Catherine Lim / Lacey Charvet6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesValerie Moss Andrews vs Lauren Hammond0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTran Black / Shannon Marino vs Marcella Perino / Caroline Eagan6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHelen Galloway-Newman / Gwendolyn Ford vs Danielle Maggio / Brittany Martin7-5, 6-3
2026-02-23vs Stone Lambert/18/3.5/NON/GACCWon 32
W#1 DoublesAmanda Mouton / Valerie Moss Andrews vs Jaime Lambert / Cheryl Price6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Webre vs Jen Staley4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Davis / Bria Papia vs Jenny Stone / Kym Valene6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSara Lewis vs Ami Brown6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGwendolyn Ford / Mary Sullivan vs Monica Grimaldi / Katy Wittmann6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-02vs Ursin/Forster/18/3.5/NON/CPLost 23
W#1 DoublesNancy Decuers / Amanda Mouton vs Cody Mannino / Brandy Bellina6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTameka Aych vs Samantha Hill1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTrinh Do / Angelle Bommarito vs Kayla Ursin / Jeanne Swingle1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesShannon Marino vs Victoria Sacco5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Ledet / Tran Black vs Holly Vinet / Rebel Daigle Salsbury6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ursin/Forster/18/3.5/NON/CP8031922272
2Morris/18/3.5/NON/XU71261435324
3Nguyen/18/3.5/NON/TTRc62261434320
4Allen/18/3.5/NON/ASTC53221840326
5Teesdale/Fallahi/18/3.5/NON/CP44192144376
6Perino/Martin/18/3.5/NON/CP26192143327
7Quast/18/3.5/NON/CP26142653392
8Stone Lambert/18/3.5/NON/GACC26162455391
9Charvat/18/3.5/NON/CP0873368441

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Lesley Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Denise Ledet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Amanda Mouton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Bria Papia
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Tran Black
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Tameka Aych
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Michelle Matherne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Helen Galloway-Newman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Alexandra Webre
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Angelle Bommarito
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Melanie Weisheit
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.20
Nancy Decuers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Valerie Moss Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Gwendolyn Ford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Shannon Marino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.04
Trinh Do
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Amanda Riso
published 3
Mary Sullivan
published
Sara Lewis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesley Davis + Nancy Decuers5060% games−3.2% vs expected
Denise Ledet + Tameka Aych134 matchesnot enough data
Angelle Bommarito + Trinh Do044 matchesnot enough data
Helen Galloway-Newman + Amanda Mouton303 matchesnot enough data
Helen Galloway-Newman + Tran Black033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lesley Davis
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Denise Ledet
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Amanda Mouton
13W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Bria Papia
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Tran Black
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Tameka Aych
14W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Michelle Matherne
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
Helen Galloway-Newman
32W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Alexandra Webre
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Angelle Bommarito
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Weisheit
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Nancy Decuers
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Valerie Moss Andrews
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Gwendolyn Ford
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Shannon Marino
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Trinh Do
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Amanda Riso
20W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Mary Sullivan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Lewis
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.