Teams

SFV LLW-The 300s/Aldo/Balboa

2026 Adult 65+ SFV Winter · SFV 65+ 7.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-24vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanny Gloria / Ben Hernandez vs John Rochford / Patrick Novak5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Tomasello / Shmuel Iscakis vs Russell Baingo / Jeffrey Pollard3-6, 3-6
2026-05-23vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlan Berkowitz / Frank Stefan vs Russell Baingo / Jeffrey Pollard4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJose Vazquez / Richard Becker vs Samuel Domingo / Edward Hatch3-6, 2-6
2026-05-23vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoe Tomasello / Richard Becker vs Edward Hatch / Samuel Domingo7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShmuel Iscakis / Mike Schmidt vs Jeffrey Pollard / John Rochford6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoWon 21
W#1 DoublesShmuel Iscakis / Joe Tomasello vs Russell Baingo / Jeffrey Pollard6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBen Hernandez / Jose Vazquez vs Samuel Domingo / Robert Ley6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAlan Berkowitz / Richard Becker vs Patrick Novak / John Rochford5-7, 4-6
2026-05-09vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdam Hirshan / Eric Book vs Robert Ley / Samuel Domingo6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRichard Becker / Richard Petherbridge vs Jeffrey Pollard / John Rochford6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShmuel Iscakis / Richard Stanley vs Russell Baingo / Patrick Novak6-3, 6-4
2026-03-28vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Tomasello / Mike Schmidt vs Lindsay Joachim / Robert Ley6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEric Book / Donald Pistotnik vs Jeffrey Pollard / John Rochford4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanny Gloria / Ben Hernandez vs Russell Baingo / Patrick Novak6-4, 6-3
2026-03-14vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoWon 30
W#1 DoublesBen Hernandez / Danny Gloria vs Russell Baingo / Jeffrey Pollard6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdam Hirshan / Donald Pistotnik vs Marcos Sevilla / Samuel Domingo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoe Tomasello / Mike Schmidt vs Edward Hatch / John Kniest6-0, 6-3
2026-03-01vs Legends/Baingo/PaseoWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Becker / Jose Vazquez vs Robert Ley / Edward Hatch6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Petherbridge / Frank Stefan vs John Rochford / Jeffrey Pollard6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoe Tomasello / Mike Schmidt vs Russell Baingo / Patrick Novak6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SFV 65+ 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SFV LLW-The 300s/Aldo/Balboa5316819172
2Legends/Baingo/Paseo3581633242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Adam Hirshan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Ben Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Danny Gloria
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Eric Book
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Aldo Argana
published 3.5
Donald Pistotnik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Alan Berkowitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Frank Stefan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joe Tomasello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jose Vazquez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Becker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Petherbridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Stanley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shmuel Iscakis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Tomasello + Mike Schmidt5080% gamesnot enough data
Richard Becker + Jose Vazquez123 matchesnot enough data
Danny Gloria + Ben Hernandez213 matchesnot enough data
Joe Tomasello + Eric Book303 matchesnot enough data
Joe Tomasello + Shmuel Iscakis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Hirshan
40W–23L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Ben Hernandez
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Danny Gloria
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Eric Book
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Aldo Argana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Donald Pistotnik
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Alan Berkowitz
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Frank Stefan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joe Tomasello
14W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Vazquez
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Schmidt
11W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Becker
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Petherbridge
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Stanley
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shmuel Iscakis
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.