Teams

Legum

2022 VA Beach Adult 18 & Over Tennis Patrons · VA Beach Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Lizanne Harris vs Elizabeth Hope / Courtney Violette1-6, 1-6
2022-05-16Won 20
W#2 DoublesNicole Legum / Michelle Fox vs Suzanne Anderson / Flurry Yanez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHaley Cool / Lexi Rawls vs Marie Kirk-Clunan / Diane Stein7-5, 7-5
2022-05-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesLexi Rawls vs Glenda Craddock6-3, 6-3
2022-04-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesLexi Rawls / Haley Cool vs Carol Chory / Barbara Langbord6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Kulas / Sheridan Conley vs Janice Hamilton / Denise Makowski6-2, 6-2
2022-04-25vs KezmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Legum / Lexi Rawls vs Linda Beaton / Suzanne Anderson1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for VA Beach Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Dillon Yost
published 4.5
4.01
Lexi Rawls
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.96
Michelle Fox
published
3.94
Lisa Deaver
published
3.75
Marlo McNaughton
published
3.75
Nicole Legum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Caroline Dozier
published 4
3.62
Sheridan Conley
published
3.52
Kathleen Wilson
published
3.42
Kristina Chastain
published 3.5
3.42
Nicole Perkins
published
3.29
Beth Kulas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Lizanne Harris
published
Whitney Harding
published
Yalonda Yost
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Legum + Kristina Chastain5258% gamesnot enough data
Beth Kulas + Kristina Chastain224 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Legum + Lisa Deaver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dillon Yost
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Lexi Rawls
80W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
4.01
Michelle Fox
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Lisa Deaver
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
Marlo McNaughton
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Nicole Legum
124W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Caroline Dozier
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Sheridan Conley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Kathleen Wilson
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kristina Chastain
65W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Nicole Perkins
15W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Lizanne Harris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Whitney Harding
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Yalonda Yost
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.