Teams

GT Bray Racquettes

2022 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 7.5 W Wednesday

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-02vs Champ-Payne EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoda Rucks / Carrie Scalcucci vs Linda Evans / SueAnn Sanders4-6, 1-6
2022-10-26vs Payne Park PerhaesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoda Rucks / Jenny Sherr vs Robin Sheridan / Cindy McCollum6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarrie Scalcucci / Sharon Balmos vs Lorraine Harvey / Marisa Perhaes1-6, 1-6
2022-10-19vs LBK Public LevyLost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Byrd / Jenny Sherr vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Patti Kuisel3-6, 3-6
2022-10-12vs LWR KellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesWanda Gilbert / Jenny Sherr vs Mae Preston / Diana Stadelnikas2-6, 0-6
2022-09-28vs Champ-Payne EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesWanda Gilbert / Carrie Scalcucci vs SueAnn Sanders / Carrie Carretta5-7, 3-6
2022-09-22vs Payne Park Pink & PearlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesWanda Gilbert / Ann Marie Toney vs Wendy Hillock / Nichole Bontell3-6, 2-6
2022-09-21vs Payne Park It's Just TennisLost 02
L#1 DoublesWanda Gilbert / Beth Arndt vs Susan Rakay / Zobeida Canfield2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Allison Byrd vs Lisa Temple / Bonnie Silverman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Wanda Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Jenny Sherr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Ann Marie Toney
published 3.5
3.22
Beth Arndt
published 3.5
3.02
Carrie Scalcucci
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.76
Pamela Deems
published
Nancy LeFevre
published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Balmos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Sherr + Wanda Gilbert2447% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Scalcucci + Beth Arndt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Wanda Gilbert
45W–82L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
Jenny Sherr
261W–237L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Ann Marie Toney
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Beth Arndt
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carrie Scalcucci
42W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.02
Pamela Deems
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.76
Nancy LeFevre
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Balmos
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.