Teams

Lost Forest - Slice Girls

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · 3.5 Ladies

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-18vs Lost Forest - The AlphaLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Gupta / Veronica Oliveira vs Angela Dains / Jiali Yang0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Mallett / Elizabeth Morrison vs Kinjal Parikh / Marie Appel1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Murray / Allison Jung vs Victoria Leyva / Emily Nelson5-7, 0-6
L#4 DoublesJenna Eastman / Erin Hoffman vs Vatsana Sou / Ana Castillo3-6, 2-6
2025-11-12vs Kingwood CC - GoldfishLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenna Eastman / Allison Jung vs Michelle Hobbs / Kari Christoferson6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCalla Shuman / Elizabeth Morrison vs Penny Smith-Hill / Nancy Schmid1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Murray / Erin Hoffman vs Gena Young / Janine Batterton0-6, 0-6
2025-11-11vs Lost Forest - Game, Set, WineLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenna Eastman / Elizabeth Morrison vs Mariana Martinez / Angela Bohorquez2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Jung / Megan Murray vs Mary Laflin / Itunu Arojo0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVeronica Oliveira / Kelly Gupta vs Kat Creech / Thoa Sutphen6-7, 2-6
2025-10-21vs Woodlands Ridgewood - PacemakersLost 13
W#1 DoublesAllison Jung / Jenna Eastman vs Jessica Llamas / Maki Field6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Morrison / Veronica Oliveira vs GLORIA GONZALEZ / Venera Klaus0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErin Hoffman / Megan Murray vs Zema Struve / Rossana Gomez0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesKelly Gupta / ANJELICA AMABLE vs Araceli Schmaltz / Asilde Montilla0-6, 1-6
2025-10-14vs Lost Forest - The AlphaLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Morrison / ANJELICA AMABLE vs Mimi Chan / Kinjal Parikh0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErin Hoffman / Monica Mallett vs Angela Dains / Vatsana Sou0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCalla Shuman / Jenna Eastman vs Ana Castillo / Emily Nelson6-4, 6-0
L#4 DoublesVeronica Oliveira / Kelly Gupta vs Kathy Fraser / Marie Appel0-6, 0-6
2025-10-07vs Lost Forest - Game, Set, WineLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Morrison / Jenna Eastman vs Mariana Martinez / IDANIA REYES3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesANJELICA AMABLE / Calla Shuman vs Janet MacCormick / Judicaelle Cocheril6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErin Hoffman / Monica Mallett vs Thoa Sutphen / Veronica Vuong0-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesMegan Murray / Allison Jung vs Itunu Arojo / Keetha Selvarajoo4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-23vs Kingwood CC - GoldfishLost 03
L#1 DoublesCalla Shuman / Erin Hoffman vs Cari Greenley / Michelle Hobbs1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Gupta / Veronica Oliveira vs Penny Smith-Hill / Kari Christoferson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Jung / Megan Murray vs Denise Dunham / Nancy Schmid2-6, 6-7
2025-09-20vs Woodlands Ridgewood - PacemakersLost 13
W#1 DoublesAllison Jung / Jenna Eastman vs Maki Field / Kristin Slay6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVeronica Oliveira / Kelly Gupta vs NOOR FERRELL / Venera Klaus1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCalla Shuman / Megan Murray vs Asilde Montilla / Krista Crenshaw1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesErin Hoffman / Monica Mallett vs Aksana Rajput / Karen Harvie0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Jenna Eastman
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published
2.94
Allison Jung
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Calla Shuman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Monica Mallett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Kelly Gupta
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Veronica Oliveira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.46
Megan Murray
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.44
ANJELICA AMABLE
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Gupta + Veronica Oliveira0514% games−26.5% vs expected
Allison Jung + Megan Murray1526% gamesnot enough data
Allison Jung + Jenna Eastman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Eastman
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Allison Jung
6W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Calla Shuman
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
Monica Mallett
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.79
Kelly Gupta
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.76
Veronica Oliveira
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.75
3
Megan Murray
1W–12L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
ANJELICA AMABLE
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.