Teams

Weddle

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 4.0 Men 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs Niggebrugge/PerezLost 12
W#1 SinglesRobert Weins vs Guilherme Perez6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMatej Polomsky vs Jordan Niggebrugge1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesElijah Warren vs Mike O'Beirne1-6, 1-6
2026-02-25vs CarrollWon 21
W#1 SinglesRobert Weins vs Zachary Manfredi6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMatej Polomsky vs Corbin Carroll4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJason Weddle vs John Chapman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRobert Weins vs Alex Armeni6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristopher Soule vs Matthew Colonna6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJason Weddle vs Corey Kershaw7-6, 7-5
2026-02-11vs Basta/Janik CFCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesAdam Pflaumer vs Matthew Janik0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesElijah Warren vs Johannes Haasbroek6-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesKeith Thomas vs Tim Rahauser2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-10vs Niggebrugge/PerezWon 21
W#1 SinglesRobert Weins vs Laurence Nadeau6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMatej Polomsky vs Guilherme Perez3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesChristopher Soule vs Matthew Williams3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAdam Pflaumer vs Matthew Conzola4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesChristopher Soule vs David McCabe6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesElijah Warren vs Alex Armeni1-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs Basta/Janik CFCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMatej Polomsky vs Johannes Haasbroek5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobert Weins vs James Dawson6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesChristopher Soule vs Nick Basta6-4, 6-2
2026-01-12vs CarrollWon 21
L#1 SinglesChristopher Soule vs Andrew Gillespie1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesElijah Warren vs David Kimbrough6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesRobert Weins vs John Chapman6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Robert Weins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.88
Matej Polomsky
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.72
Christopher Soule
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.71
Jason Weddle
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.62
Elijah Warren
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.52
Keith Thomas
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.48
Adam Pflaumer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Weins
26W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Matej Polomsky
29W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Christopher Soule
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
Jason Weddle
43W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Elijah Warren
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Keith Thomas
35W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Adam Pflaumer
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.