Teams

CCGC/Meagan Jones

2025 GIT Women's Flex - Fall '24 · Women's Multi Level Flex 2.5 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-21vs CCGC/Mary YoungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Foley / LorieAnn Wright vs Kim Delaney / Sue Cole5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesFelecia Dyer vs Amy Anderson6-0, 6-0
2024-11-30vs CCGC/Mary YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesFelecia Dyer / Kathryn Foley vs Mitzi Antonio / Amy Anderson6-3, 6-1
2024-11-23vs CCGC/Mary YoungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesConnie Bolthouse / LorieAnn Wright vs Jill Anders / Sue Cole2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Foley vs Kim Delaney6-3, 6-1
2024-11-09vs CCGC/Mary YoungWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeagan Jones / Connie Bolthouse vs Jill Anders / Amy Anderson6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlyssa Peterson vs Kim Delaney6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-02vs CCGC/Mary YoungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFelecia Dyer / Connie Bolthouse vs Shonda Rae Kohlhoff / Mitzi Antonio3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLorieAnn Wright / Alyssa Peterson vs Kim Delaney / Jill Anders7-5, 6-3
2024-10-26vs CCGC/Mary YoungWon 21
W#1 DoublesFelecia Dyer / Alyssa Peterson vs Mitzi Antonio / Jill Anders7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMeagan Jones vs Shonda Rae Kohlhoff1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLorieAnn Wright / Kathryn Foley vs Sue Cole / Amy Anderson6-2, 6-0
2024-10-12vs CCGC/Mary YoungWon 20
W#1 DoublesConnie Bolthouse / LorieAnn Wright vs Jill Anders / Kim Delaney6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMeagan Jones vs Sue Cole6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Multi Level Flex 2.5 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Kathryn Foley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.53
Felecia Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Alyssa Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Connie Bolthouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
LorieAnn Wright
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Meagan Jones
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Foley
22W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%33%67%
2.56
Felecia Dyer
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
2.5
Alyssa Peterson
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Connie Bolthouse
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
LorieAnn Wright
11W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Meagan Jones
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.