Teams

DTC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

16 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs DCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Alterman / Wendy Glazer vs Suzanne MacKenzie / Julie Groves4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Sipes vs Brooke Simpson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJann Peterson / Jody Hunnicutt vs Gina Carbone Fenton / Heather Benes6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMaura Spangler / Rebecca Wulliman vs Megan Harry / Sara McDonnell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-09vs CM PINKSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Jann Peterson vs Katie Comisky / Megan Fredricks1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSharon Kelly vs Michelle Eidson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Glazer / Annette Isham vs Lea VanSchaack / Jeannette Tighe6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAshley Daidone / Elizabeth Sipes vs Cathy Roper / Paula Cohen5-7, 2-6
2026-07-02vs DTP YELLOWLost 13
W#1 DoublesSharon Kelly / Jody Hunnicutt vs Laura Wasserman / Kelly Fitz6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Alterman vs Kara Gwinn2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJann Peterson / Julie Underdahl vs Molly Garg / Rohini Gupta0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Daidone / Meredith Suter vs Elaina Grauer / Reba Tsvetkova5-7, 1-6
2026-06-25vs CACM GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesSharon Kelly / Jann Peterson vs Heather Mitchell / Jodi Brown0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnnette Isham vs Melissa Heine6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWendy Glazer / Nancy Alterman vs Sarah Jensik / Patricia Olson0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Rebecca Wulliman vs Leslie Greer / Serena Sampat6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-18vs CP NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Jann Peterson vs Andrea Woolley / Alex Graves6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSharon Kelly vs Roline Rosen1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Glazer / Nancy Alterman vs Jodi Denton / Jessica Rae6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Yoder / Jody Hunnicutt vs Alicia Jiron / VERA DIVENYI2-5
2026-06-11vs WP BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Jody Hunnicutt vs Lynn Turner / Kathleen McKern6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAnnette Isham vs Elizabeth Paoli1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Wulliman / Nancy Alterman vs Judy Tanita / Lisa DeBastos6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Samuelson / Sharon Kelly vs Liz Waryn / Lynn LaTorre6-3, 6-2
2026-06-04vs CACM TEALLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Jann Peterson vs Leslie Rich / Eden Parker6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnnette Isham vs Christine Johnson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Wulliman / Jody Hunnicutt vs Bobbie Turner / Sarah Kopp6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Kelly / Julie Underdahl vs Mary Deluccia / Kris Staaf-Bendixen3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Maura Spangler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Sharon Kelly
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
3.25
Annette Isham
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Wulliman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Wendy Glazer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Julie Underdahl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.11
Nancy Alterman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Jann Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Meredith Suter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Elizabeth Sipes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.97
Ashley Daidone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
2.90
Deborah Yoder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Katherine Samuelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maura Spangler + Rebecca Wulliman4455% games+3.7% vs expected
Maura Spangler + Jann Peterson6259% games+0.5% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Sharon Kelly3253% games−0.4% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Julie Underdahl6552% games−1.1% vs expected
Wendy Glazer + Nancy Alterman111047% games−1.2% vs expected
Ashley Daidone + Meredith Suter0534% games−6.2% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Jann Peterson171058% games−6.5% vs expected
Deborah Yoder + Helene Grall-Johnson2638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maura Spangler
49W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Sharon Kelly
19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Migdalia Morillo Rettig
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Annette Isham
56W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Rebecca Wulliman
15W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Wendy Glazer
79W–93L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Julie Underdahl
53W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Nancy Alterman
30W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jann Peterson
51W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Meredith Suter
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08
Elizabeth Sipes
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Ashley Daidone
43W–100L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Helene Grall-Johnson
31W–83L career · type A · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Deborah Yoder
37W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Katherine Samuelson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.