Teams

Wynlakes-Miller-4.0-18-Fall

2025 · 2026 Fall USTA Adult 18 & Over Night League Mont

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKara Beatrous / Erika McKay vs Gina Speagle / Lauren Reasner3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-11-05vs Wynlakes GelabertWon 10
W#1 DoublesKara Beatrous / Charlsie Rampy vs Julie Brand / Barbi Gelabert6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-29Won 20
W#1 SinglesKara Beatrous vs Natali Wiedemann6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCharlsie Rampy / Lisa Jolly vs Vanessa Brown / Lauren Reasner6-1, 6-2
2025-10-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesKara Beatrous vs Lynsey Anne Wood6-2, 6-1
2025-10-08vs Lagoon HolmesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKara Beatrous / Charlsie Rampy vs La'Pearl Wright / Margaret Herd6-3, 6-3
2025-09-24vs Wynlakes GelabertLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharlsie Rampy / Jenni Payne vs Kelly Bibb / Graci Sellers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2026 Fall USTA Adult 18 & Over Night League Mont
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wynlakes-Miller-4.0-18-Fall42131126210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Michelle Slack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.83
Kara Beatrous
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.75
Lisa Jolly
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.74
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.65
Charlsie Rampy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Erika McKay
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.48
Jennifer Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.45
Daphne Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
Jennifer Black
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlsie Rampy + Kara Beatrous8163% games+10.3% vs expected
Lisa Jolly + Jenni Payne4158% games−0.5% vs expected
Michelle Slack + Jennifer Black404 matchesnot enough data
Erika McKay + Kara Beatrous123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Slack
32W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
Kara Beatrous
16W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Lisa Jolly
19W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Charlsie Rampy
17W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Erika McKay
14W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Henderson
55W–13L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Daphne Johnston
21W–6L career · type A · 10 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jennifer Black
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.