Teams

USTA Atlanta/Robin Schorr

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.5 Women (Arrie Lugar)

18 players · average NTRP 4.42 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elise Raniere
published 5
4.68
Veronica O'Brien
published
4.61
Michele McBride
published
4.45
Nicole Hall
published
4.37
Yuki Neary
published
4.36
Robin Schorr
published
4.33
Jodie Kappers
published
4.32
Jennifer Rodman
published
4.31
Hannah Haverdink
published 4.5
4.30
Carolyn Michels
published 4.5
4.24
Marypat Marcoccio
published
4.24
Sarah Dellinger
published
4.04
Jenny Herman
published
3.98
Gail Chanin
published 4.5
3.80
Emily Rogers
published 4
Ashley Coleman
published 4
Donna Neidorf
published
Michele Austin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marypat Marcoccio + Robin Schorr4162% games+11.4% vs expected
Michele McBride + Robin Schorr12169% games+9.4% vs expected
Emily Rogers + Michele Austin6068% games+6.5% vs expected
Michele McBride + Veronica O'Brien10068% games+5.0% vs expected
Veronica O'Brien + Hannah Haverdink17165% games+3.5% vs expected
Carolyn Michels + Hannah Haverdink421757% games+2.9% vs expected
Sarah Dellinger + Donna Neidorf12459% games+2.2% vs expected
Jodie Kappers + Yuki Neary5254% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elise Raniere
15W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Veronica O'Brien
59W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
4.68
Michele McBride
91W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
4.61
Nicole Hall
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
4.45
Yuki Neary
60W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
4.37
Robin Schorr
70W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
Jodie Kappers
49W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.33
Jennifer Rodman
86W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Hannah Haverdink
77W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Carolyn Michels
82W–40L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.30
Marypat Marcoccio
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.24
Sarah Dellinger
46W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Jenny Herman
35W–28L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Gail Chanin
23W–24L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Emily Rogers
40W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Ashley Coleman
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Donna Neidorf
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Austin
16W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.