Teams

Brevard/Luer/40&Over3.0W

2024 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-04vs EFSC - TaylorLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Taylor / Katharyn Luer vs Susan Wilkes / Janis Mena7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-26vs Suntree - HonakerWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Love / Renee Jiannine vs Anastasia Mika / Nancy Hastings6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Natalie Taylor vs Karyn Honaker / Jeannie Fox Craig6-1, 6-3
2024-02-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonika DeMari / Renee Jiannine vs Cristina Faherty / Natalie Oswell6-0, 6-2
2024-02-12vs Brevard/Leiter/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Nina Lloyd vs Ginger Ballou / Lynne Moody6-4, 6-4
2024-02-05vs RCCB - CordisWon 20
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Natalie Taylor vs Susan Ford / Frances Miles6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Daricca Facciobene vs Kelli Cordis / Jean Romanelli6-2, 6-4
2024-02-01vs EFSC - TaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Natalie Taylor vs Janis Mena / Susan Wilkes6-4, 7-5
2024-01-29vs Suntree - FordWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaricca Facciobene / Renee Jiannine vs Sharon Ford / Amy McCleery6-3, 6-1
2024-01-08vs Suntree - HonakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Natalie Taylor vs Frances Halley / Karyn Honaker7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Leslie Love
published
2.92
Renee Jiannine
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Laura Rouveyrol
published
2.69
Michelle Dunn
published
2.68
Erin Conway
published 3
2.27
Anne Burns
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+10.3% vs expected
Laura Rouveyrol + Katharyn Luer134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Love
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.28
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Laura Rouveyrol
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Daricca Facciobene
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Dunn
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Erin Conway
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Anne Burns
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.