Teams

SoCal/Odanaka/65&Over8.0M

2023 Adult 65 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Men - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Kyungwon Kang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Al Jasinskas
published 4
3.61
John Shure
published
3.51
Rick Rumpp
published
Robert Conte
published
Robert Rudelius
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kyungwon Kang
80W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Al Jasinskas
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
John Shure
101W–64L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
Rick Rumpp
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Robert Conte
22W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Rudelius
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.