Teams

SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Freedman

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday)

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-08vs SoCal/Blair/18&Over2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesEcho Roben / Anu Venkatesh vs Natalie Grant / Corrine Lott4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLora Iliev vs Alicia Sodergreen4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Lamanna / Catherine Price vs Shirley Quach / Lydia Logan2-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobin Delaney / Sarah Narhi vs Erica Smith / Jamie Cooper1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMonique Labarre vs Shannon Mcfarland6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesOlga Freedman / Catherine Price vs Linda Hastings / Kathee Weisenberg3-6, 3-6
2026-05-11vs SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ JimenezWon 30
W#1 DoublesEcho Roben / Monique Labarre vs Brigitte Cohen / Hiroyo Poland6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnu Venkatesh vs Giovanna Jimenez6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobin Delaney / Polina Cherevichnaya vs Monica Olivares / Ashton Ellis7-5, 6-2
2026-05-04vs SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ WilliamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonique Labarre / Catherine Price vs Yara Williams / Tobi Tanner6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Warren vs Erica Smith6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEcho Roben / Olga Freedman vs Karen Lowe / Helen Willink3-6, 3-6
2026-05-01vs SD 2.5 Sunbow Park (2:1)/ CruzLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Warren / Polina Cherevichnaya vs Samaria Cruz / Noor Hilmi6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLora Iliev vs Karen Buttgenbach3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Lamanna / Sarah Narhi vs Jennifer Contreras / Desiree Huynh4-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs SoCal/Blair/18&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Longstreth / Sarah Narhi vs Cecilia Blair / Miriam Mceachern0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEcho Roben vs Alicia Sodergreen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Price / Polina Cherevichnaya vs Corrine Lott / Jessica Bunster0-6, 2-6
2026-04-13vs WC SD 2.5 Mtn View/ CallerosLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobin Delaney / Lora Iliev vs Diana Aispuro / Ana Lucia Almada0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMonique Labarre vs Lucia Calleros0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnu Venkatesh / Rebecca Lamanna vs Rebecca Canales / Teresa Vega4-6, 2-6
2026-03-30vs SD 2.5 LJBTC/ FeuersteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Narhi / Christina Warren vs Kate Kassar / Kelly Posthumus6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRebecca Lamanna vs Johanna Palomino4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Delaney / Olga Freedman vs Amanda Feghali / Lisa Bresnahan6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SoCal/Blair/18&Over2.5W6218613154
2WC SD 2.5 Mtn View/ Calleros62141022178
3SD 2.5 Sunbow Park (2:1)/ Cruz62131128211
4SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Freedman35111329220
5SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ Jimenez3591532226
6SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ Williams26101431235
7SD 2.5 LJBTC/ Feuerstein2691533237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Christina Warren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.55
Monique Labarre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.46
Polina Cherevichnaya
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.44
Robin Delaney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.24
Anu Venkatesh
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Sarah Narhi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.20
Echo Roben
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.00
Catherine Price
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.96
Lora Iliev
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.90
Rebecca Lamanna
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.87
Olga Freedman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Longstreth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olga Freedman + Echo Roben033 matchesnot enough data
Olga Freedman + Robin Delaney213 matchesnot enough data
Anu Venkatesh + Rebecca Lamanna033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Christina Warren
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Monique Labarre
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.55
Polina Cherevichnaya
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
Robin Delaney
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Anu Venkatesh
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Sarah Narhi
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Echo Roben
5W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Catherine Price
3W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Lora Iliev
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Rebecca Lamanna
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Olga Freedman
5W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Karen Longstreth
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.