Teams

TRC - Richey

2025 B'ham Combo - Adult 18 & Over - Weeknight · 5.5 Women - Monday Evening

10 players · average NTRP 2.67 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-02vs West Homewood - Peters/HancockSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Weissgerber / Dana Ray vs Katherine Warren / Emily Hornsby2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Braue / Karen Estes vs Kate Hiden / Mary Katzman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-19vs HCC - Adams/MinorLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Warren / Karen Estes vs Sharon Bolt / Jennifer DeHart6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Robertson / Dana Ray vs Michelle Watts / Megan Crandall2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-14vs Gardendale - ZassodaWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeah Braue / Dana Ray vs Meriem Bellal / Sharon Hargreaves6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSandy Argo / Hollie Johnson vs Elizabeth Mcgill / Mandy Oswalt6-2, 7-5
2025-08-12vs Pine Tree - BowenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDana Ray / Katherine Dearing vs Ashley Shelby / Laura Bright1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Richey / Lynn Reid vs Sarah Pugliese / Sarah Blutter4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-04vs Riverchase - DaigleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Braue / Dana Ray vs Jennifer Giadrosich / Sam Branch7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngela Weissgerber / Karen Estes vs Lark Livingston / Emily Masters7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHollie Johnson / Sandy Argo vs Shanette Daigle / Katy Mccay3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-28vs BH 5.5 W 18 & Over (Graves/Doss)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Weissgerber / Dana Ray vs Angela Cothran / April Jackson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Warren / Karen Estes vs Jeanne Gallagher / Leah Doss0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Robertson / Melissa Richey vs Serena Porter / Jennifer Blumberg0-6, 3-6
2025-07-21vs VCC - Rangel/SmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Reid / Dana Ray vs Hala Brown / Rebekah Hunter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandy Argo / Hollie Johnson vs Andrea Warren / Shelley Gardner3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLeslie Warren / Dana Ray vs Alison Lassiter / Haley Hazelrig6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeah Braue / Katherine Dearing vs Anne Herfurth / Devan Given6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynn Reid / Melissa Richey vs Katie Bell / Ellie Priester3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 5.5 Women - Monday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BH 5.5 W 18 & Over (Graves/Doss)802138139
2BH 5.5W 18 & Over (Rodgers)8119818194
3Greystone CC - Lucas6319824219
4West Homewood - Peters/Hancock53131124202
5VCC - Rangel/Smith53141025195
6Vestavia Country Club -Booth/Brown54151227220
7HCC - Adams/Minor44101432228
8Inverness C. Club - West45131431253
9Country Club of Birmingham - Hardison45101736255
10TRC - Richey35101431224
11PRC - Zajaczkoski36111634249
12LJCC - McEnerney3691837263
13Hoover C. Club - Sipes36101738278
14Riverchase - Daigle2591227201
15Country Club of Birmingham - Given1781634237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Leah Braue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Angela Weissgerber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Lynn Reid
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Leslie Warren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Karen Estes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.29
Katherine Dearing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Hollie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Dana Ray
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
2.21
Melissa Richey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandy Argo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Richey + Lynn Reid3443% games−1.6% vs expected
Hollie Johnson + Sandy Argo123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Weissgerber + Karen Estes213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Ray + Leslie Warren033 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Warren + Karen Estes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Braue
34W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Angela Weissgerber
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Lynn Reid
5W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Leslie Warren
3W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
Karen Estes
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.44
Katherine Dearing
9W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Hollie Johnson
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Dana Ray
11W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Melissa Richey
5W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Sandy Argo
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.