Teams

Keyes, Angie

2025 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-07vs Collins, MindyLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Farris / Karen Deer vs Mindy Collins / Karen de Kock3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAngie Keyes / Robbie Ellard vs Allison Ruhl / Tina Fulcher6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathie Hall / Gay Grantham vs Terra Alexander / Emily Gregory1-6, 2-6
2025-03-31vs Bradshaw, LynnLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngie Keyes / Susan Farris vs Lisa McGee / Stacey Coulter3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Warren / Karen Deer vs Gayla Sanders / Teresa Dottley3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGay Grantham / Kathie Hall vs Sabrina Sutherland / Kim Cumberland1-6, 2-6
2025-03-24vs Shannon, RhondaWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngie Keyes / Susan Farris vs Cheryl Sykes / Rena Shepherd3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelanie Warren / Jeanine Gray vs Rhonda Shannon / Jane Brown6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGay Grantham / Kathie Hall vs Celia Manley / Carolyn Whyte6-3, 6-4
2025-03-17vs LeDuff, StacieWon 31
L#1 DoublesConnie Brewer / Karen Deer vs Jennifer Moore / Yvette Major0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGay Grantham vs Stacie Leduff4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Keyes / Susan Farris vs Elizabeth Torricelli / Jean Tonnar-Seale6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathie Hall / Jeanine Gray vs Judy Gunn / Jan Woodson6-3, 6-1
2025-03-03vs Sykes, JoannaLost 04
L#1 DoublesJeanine Gray / Melanie Warren vs Joanna Sykes / Anna Hughes0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKathie Hall vs Sharon Ryan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Brewer / Robbie Ellard vs Kimberly Wooten / Anita Trigg6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGay Grantham / Debbie McNeely vs Ginny Sims / Amanda Barry0-6, 1-6
2025-02-24vs Sing, StephanieLost 04
L#1 DoublesDonna ONeill / Connie Brewer vs Cindy Page / Lori Williams1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJeanine Gray vs Stephanie Sing4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Farris / Melanie Warren vs Amanda Galey / Amber Mullin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGay Grantham / Kathie Hall vs Kelly Mitchell / Hayley Hayes0-6, 3-6
2025-02-17vs Castle, MandyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Warren / Susan Farris vs Heather Bailey / Julie Tompkins1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Brewer / Jeanine Gray vs Heather Biddle / Meredith Boston1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGay Grantham / Kathie Hall vs Laura McMahon / Nikki Ramsey1-6, 2-6
2025-02-10vs Santangelo, FayeLost 03
L#1 DoublesConnie Brewer / Susan Farris vs Angelina Vanlandingham / Sheila Self2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie McNeely / Kathie Hall vs Deborah McGehee / Tina Harris1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Day / Gay Grantham vs Monique Kelly / Tina Roberts1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Castle, Mandy6225720196
2Keyes, Angie2662654341
3LeDuff, Stacie0842857347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Karen Deer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Connie Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Donna ONeill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Angie Keyes
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.61
Susan Farris
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.51
Robbie Ellard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Debbie McNeely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Gay Grantham
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
Jeanine Gray
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Kathie Hall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Melanie Warren
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Monica Day
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Shaffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Farris + Angie Keyes3449% games+14.8% vs expected
Kathie Hall + Gay Grantham1430% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Deer
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Connie Brewer
5W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Donna ONeill
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3.5
Angie Keyes
10W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
Susan Farris
6W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Robbie Ellard
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Debbie McNeely
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gay Grantham
2W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanine Gray
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathie Hall
3W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Warren
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Day
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Shaffer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.