Teams

Vanlandingham, Angie

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
3.21
Deborah McGehee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jamie McNamara
published
3.12
Karen Deer
published
3.00
Tina Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jackie DeCamp
published
2.87
Jeanna Tanner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Vonda Reeves
published
2.83
Jan Woodson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Angie Keyes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.61
Susan Farris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah McGehee + Jan Woodson7260% games+17.6% vs expected
Deborah McGehee + Jeanna Tanner6256% games+15.2% vs expected
Susan Farris + Angie Keyes3449% games+14.8% vs expected
Jeanna Tanner + Jan Woodson3350% games+8.4% vs expected
Karen Deer + Tina Roberts4157% gamesnot enough data
Jeanna Tanner + Angelina Vanlandingham2349% gamesnot enough data
Deborah McGehee + Vonda Reeves033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angelina Vanlandingham
8W–14L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Deborah McGehee
62W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Jamie McNamara
14W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
Karen Deer
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Tina Roberts
24W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jackie DeCamp
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Jeanna Tanner
28W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Vonda Reeves
6W–32L career · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Jan Woodson
39W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.83
3.5
Angie Keyes
10W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
Susan Farris
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.