Teams

Tarpon Warren Mixed

2025 Pinellas NA Mixed 18 & Over Fall · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-07vs InnisbrookSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMel Griffin / Elise Hall vs Patricia Aliak / Gorban Aliak6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrandy Mickey / Don Porter vs Andrew Young / Lisa DeGoes3-6, 4-6
2025-11-09vs InnisbrookWon 10
W#2 DoublesTori Disalvio / Don Porter vs Melissa Bryan / Skyler Bryan6-3, 6-3
2025-10-19vs InnisbrookWon 10
W#2 DoublesTori Disalvio / John Weissler III vs Lisa DeGoes / Andrew Young7-5, 6-0
2025-10-12vs SPTC JacomeLost 01
L#2 DoublesTori Disalvio / Don Porter vs SANJAY GOSALIA / Katherine Oliveira1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Amy Warren
published 4
3.73
Tori Disalvio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Brandy Mickey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Elise Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Mel Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Declan Mansfield
published 3.5
3.26
Don Porter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
John Weissler III
published
3.19
Matthew Johns
published
Neil Lamis
published
Susan Weissler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tori Disalvio + Don Porter4263% gamesnot enough data
Brandy Mickey + John Weissler III4257% gamesnot enough data
Susan Weissler + Matthew Johns314 matchesnot enough data
Elise Hall + Matthew Johns134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Warren + Don Porter303 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Mickey + Don Porter123 matchesnot enough data
Elise Hall + Declan Mansfield213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Warren
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Tori Disalvio
86W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Brandy Mickey
77W–49L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Elise Hall
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mel Griffin
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Declan Mansfield
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Don Porter
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
John Weissler III
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Matthew Johns
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Monica Perez de Lara
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Neil Lamis
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Weissler
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.