Teams

The Ad-Ins

2026 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.40 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-09-06vs JL Tennis 4.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErik Tseng / Christopher Gora vs Zen Terao / Michael Chen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-09-06vs ServivorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBradley Uy / Kurt Irvine vs Kellen Higa / Remii Tanaka6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-08vs Game, Set, CrampLost 01
L#1 DoublesErik Tseng / Jeff Gaddi vs Chad Shibuya / Harold Shimono6-7, 6-7
2026-08-05vs Tryin not to b lastLost 01
L#1 DoublesErik Tseng / Kurt Irvine vs Marc Cayetano / Gregory Zukeran1-6, 2-6
2026-07-26vs Tryin not to b lastLost 01
L#1 DoublesBradley Uy / Kurt Irvine vs Tyler Makabe / Jace Akagi-Okuma6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-18vs JL Tennis 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesBradley Uy / Christopher Gora vs Michael Chen / Benjamin Dunn6-1, 6-3
2026-07-12vs ServivorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Gaddi / Christopher Gora vs Maximus Hui / Travis Yoshimoto7-6
2026-07-05vs Game, Set, CrampLost 01
L#1 DoublesBradley Uy / Jeff Gaddi vs Harold Shimono / Jordan Doi3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Game, Set, Cramp6060049
2Tryin not to b last4242545
3The Ad-Ins2424858
4JL Tennis 4.525251181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Jeff Gaddi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Bradley Uy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Kurt Irvine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Christopher Gora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Erik Tseng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Gaddi + Christopher Gora7161% games+7.5% vs expected
Kurt Irvine + Bradley Uy4260% games+5.9% vs expected
Jeff Gaddi + Kurt Irvine12658% games+2.8% vs expected
Jeff Gaddi + Bradley Uy21562% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jeff Gaddi
116W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Bradley Uy
157W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Kurt Irvine
107W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Christopher Gora
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Erik Tseng
54W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.