Teams

CCRC - Meadows

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall '24 · Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-26vs CCRC - FanningLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Owens / Darren Turner vs Steve Fanning / Jimmy Wagner6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlan Busby vs Brandon Tinker1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRakesh Baman / Brant Williams vs Sammy Crawford / Sterling Hamilton6-1, 6-3
2024-11-12vs CCRC - FanningLost 14
L#1 DoublesDarren Meadows / Darren Turner vs Brandon Tinker / Jered Freed2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTim Burket vs Sterling Hamilton4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRakesh Baman / Tommy Norris vs Charles Corley / Byron Sullivan6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlan Busby / Matthew Griffin vs Steve Fanning / Jimmy Wagner3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesBrant Williams / Trevor Adkins vs Kevin Banks / Sammy Crawford6-3, 6-3
2024-09-24vs CCRC - FanningLost 23
W#1 DoublesDarren Turner / Brant Williams vs Jered Freed / Chris Neal7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTommy Norris vs Steve Fanning6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRakesh Baman / Matthew Griffin vs Byron Sullivan / Charles Corley3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlan Busby / Sergei Kirov vs Brandon Tinker / Sterling Hamilton1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesTim Burket / Trevor Adkins vs Sammy Crawford / Kevin Banks4-6, 3-6
2024-09-17vs CCRC - FanningLost 23
W#1 DoublesKevin Owens / Darren Turner vs Jered Freed / Chris Neal3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrant Williams vs Brandon Tinker2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRakesh Baman / Alan Busby vs Sammy Crawford / Vishal Marneni4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDarren Meadows / Shawn Risher vs Jimmy Wagner / Byron Sullivan3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesTommy Norris / Sam Stevens vs Sterling Hamilton / Kevin Banks2-6, 1-6
2024-09-03vs CCRC - FanningLost 23
W#1 DoublesBrant Williams / Darren Turner vs Steve Fanning / Brandon Tinker1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTommy Norris vs Sterling Hamilton7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDarren Meadows / Alan Busby vs Chris Neal / Vishal Marneni3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTrevor Adkins / Tim Burket vs Byron Sullivan / Charles Corley0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesSergei Kirov / Matthew Griffin vs Jimmy Wagner / Sammy Crawford4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-13vs CCRC - FanningLost 23
L#1 DoublesShawn Risher / Sam Stevens vs Brandon Tinker / Steve Fanning1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTim Burket vs Vishal Marneni0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Owens / Rakesh Baman vs Chris Neal / Sammy Crawford6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlan Busby / Matthew Griffin vs Charles Corley / Byron Sullivan2-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesDarren Meadows / Trevor Adkins vs Jered Freed / Kevin Banks1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC - Fanning60201024221
2CCRC - Meadows06102044318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Rakesh Baman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Tommy Norris
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Darren Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Darren Meadows
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Trevor Adkins
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Alan Busby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Brant Williams
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.38
Tim Burket
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Sergei Kirov
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Owens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sam Stevens
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shawn Risher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rakesh Baman + Darren Turner3351% games−1.0% vs expected
Shawn Risher + Sam Stevens2539% gamesnot enough data
Brant Williams + Darren Turner2346% gamesnot enough data
Brant Williams + Rakesh Baman314 matchesnot enough data
Darren Meadows + Rakesh Baman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rakesh Baman
15W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Tommy Norris
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Darren Turner
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Darren Meadows
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.54
Trevor Adkins
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Alan Busby
6W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Brant Williams
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Tim Burket
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.38
Sergei Kirov
0W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Kevin Owens
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Stevens
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Risher
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.