Teams

EM NAVY

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 5.5 - ITA

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-20vs DTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Leher / Mark Leher vs Kelli Pfaff / Evan Pfaff4-6, 5-7
2023-08-13vs SKY REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa LoJacono / Stephen LoJacono vs David Marom / Jenifer Marom0-6, 5-7
2023-08-06vs NJ REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephen LoJacono / Lisa LoJacono vs Pamela Johnstone / Timothy Pistol1-6, 2-6
2023-07-30vs BRMST REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa LoJacono / Stephen LoJacono vs Ryan Kucera / Lisa Francisco6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEllen Leher / Mark Leher vs Sharla Prom / Doug Prom6-2, 6-0
2023-07-23vs RCC GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesEllen Leher / Mark Leher vs Elizabeth Odegaard / Ashok Reddy2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephen LoJacono / Lisa LoJacono vs Chrissy Hasek / Jamie Sutton1-6, 3-6
2023-07-16vs DTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Leher / Mark Leher vs Kelli Pfaff / Evan Pfaff7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-09vs SKY REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Leher / Ellen Leher vs Mark Kristensson / Candace Kristensson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 5.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Mark Leher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Sheryl Chandler
published
2.88
Ellen Leher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
Paul Chandler
published
2.60
Stephen LoJacono
published
2.58
JOHN INGRAHAM
published
2.58
Sarah Olney
published
2.36
Lisa LoJacono
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.19
Anne Siverson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Chandler + Sheryl Chandler0738% games+9.2% vs expected
Mark Leher + Ellen Leher201554% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mark Leher
49W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
Sheryl Chandler
27W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Ellen Leher
83W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Paul Chandler
22W–22L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Stephen LoJacono
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
JOHN INGRAHAM
13W–28L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
2.58
Sarah Olney
19W–30L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Lisa LoJacono
49W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Anne Siverson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.