Teams

Brookhaven

2025 Adult 55 & Over-SW · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Rockie Netherland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Deborah McGehee
published 3.5
3.13
Dwana Wright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Tina Roberts
published
2.91
Anna Giust
published 3
2.87
Jeanna Tanner
published
2.76
Celeste Carty
published 3
Kimmie Polk
published
Marlene Cupit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Winborne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah McGehee + Jeanna Tanner6256% games+15.2% vs expected
Dwana Wright + Sandy Winborne314 matchesnot enough data
Anna Giust + Kimmie Polk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rockie Netherland
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Deborah McGehee
62W–44L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Dwana Wright
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Tina Roberts
24W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Anna Giust
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jeanna Tanner
28W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Celeste Carty
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Kimmie Polk
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marlene Cupit
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Winborne
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.