Teams

Magnificent 5

2024 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Nichole Anglin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Wendy Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Jenny Marston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesNichole Anglin / Jenny Marston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNichole Anglin / Jenny Marston vs Jordan Brown / Stephanie Haas3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNichole Anglin / Zoe Larkins vs Sara Crate / Katie Jurgenson7-6, 6-2
2024-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNichole Anglin / Zoe Larkins vs Miki Han / Lisa Hockman6-2, 7-5
2024-07-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesZoe Larkins / Nichole Anglin vs Tammy Cofield / Rebecca van Sickle4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNichole Anglin / Zoe Larkins vs Kimberly Parks / Nina Hanson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesNichole Anglin / Jenny Marston vs Barbara Gram / Andrea Lamprecht7-5, 7-6
2024-06-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Marston / Wendy Schmidt vs Heidi Kjos / Lorna Goth6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Nichole Anglin
81W–65L career
not enough data
3.5
Wendy Schmidt
41W–32L career
26%74%0%
3.06
3.5
Jenny Marston
11W–26L career
42%58%0%
2.99

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.