Teams

No Love

2023 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince George's Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-15vs Serving YouLost 03
L#1 DoublesTjuana Jenkins / Novella Bridges vs Beverly Taylor / Tisha Tyson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGwendolyn Vauss / Marcia Dozier vs Sherri Colston / Wanda Fells3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGale Powell / Melanie Moore vs Donna Garland / Staci Steward3-6, 3-6
2023-07-09vs Racqueteers 3.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesGale Powell / LaToya Hill vs Lourdes Sanchez / Tracie Hill2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGwendolyn Vauss / Marion McGee vs Hye-Soo Baek / Melanie Babb6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2023-07-08vs Serving YouSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTjuana Jenkins / Novella Bridges vs Donna Garland / Staci Steward6-7, 5-5
W#3 DoublesMartha Givan / Gale Powell vs Wanda Fells / JENNIFER JOY6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-06vs LoVV 3.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesGale Powell / Natalie Anderson vs Lisa Cacciatore / Donnita McMillan1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMartha Givan / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Sheila Jennings / Sherreen Ogletree6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-25vs LoVV 3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Givan / Tjuana Jenkins vs Robin Bennefield / Darlene Walker2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Anderson / Gale Powell vs Lisa Cacciatore / Constance Manning6-7, 1-6
2023-06-18vs Racqueteers 3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNatalie Anderson / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Keilia Phillips / Emily Schabacker1-6, 3-6
2023-06-11vs Lady Acers 3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Givan / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Tosha Clark / Tia Holt5-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesGale Powell / Julie Anderson vs Karen Casey / Angela Gallacher6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince George's Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Novella Bridges
published
2.69
Tjuana Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Gale Powell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Martha Givan
published
2.37
Gwendolyn Vauss
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gwendolyn Vauss + Gale Powell31039% games−8.3% vs expected
Tjuana Jenkins + Gale Powell3355% gamesnot enough data
Gwendolyn Vauss + Tjuana Jenkins044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Novella Bridges
15W–24L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Tjuana Jenkins
29W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Gale Powell
36W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Martha Givan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Gwendolyn Vauss
43W–122L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.