← Teams

DRAKE / ZIFF - Belmont CC

2022 Loudoun Singles Women · Loudoun Women's 3.5 Singles

5 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-12vs McMULLEN/ PLACE - BroadlandsLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesKaren Ziff vs Margaret Amy Flaherty1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLeanne Drake vs Karen Sullivan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-26Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesShannon Pettit vs Kimberly Murray2-6, 6-7
2022-09-21Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesShannon Pettit vs Caroline Hedges6-4, 6-3
2022-09-19vs MURRAY/ TENHAEFF - Creighton FarmsWon 2–0
W#2 SinglesKaren Ziff vs HEATHER HUGHES6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLeanne Drake vs Julia Moss6-3, 6-2
2022-09-15Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesKaren Ziff vs Kimberly Murray1-6, 3-6
2022-08-31Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesLeanne Drake vs Karen Sullivan6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Women's 3.5 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Shannon Pettit
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
—
3.15
Karen Ziff
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Donna James
published 3.5
2.87
Leanne Drake
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ziff + Shannon Pettit34–3350% games−2.5% vs expected
Donna James + Shannon Pettit2–348% games−2.6% vs expected
Leanne Drake + Karen Ziff11–1747% gamesnot enough data
Leanne Drake + Shannon Pettit2–1338% gamesnot enough data
Donna James + Karen Ziff0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shannon Pettit
105W–136L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Alexandra Kardasilari
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
3.5
Karen Ziff
124W–166L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Donna James
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Leanne Drake
178W–263L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.