Teams

FL - Sanford

2025 Charlottesville Combo · Charlottesville Combo 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-28vs FCC - WoodriffLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg vs Jenn Crutchfield Worth / Caroline Childers4-6, 1-6
2025-10-23vs Glenmore - EgidiWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg vs Rebecca Bushey / Kathleen Edwards6-2, 6-2
2025-10-21vs BHSC - SwitzerWon 10
W#1 DoublesShauna Hogg / Mary Manley vs Brandy Bridges / Jennifer Farmer6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-14vs FCC - WoodriffWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg vs Dianna Gibson / Courtney Sievers6-1, 6-3
2025-10-02vs Glenmore - EgidiWon 10
W#3 DoublesMinal Shah / Lynette Sanford vs Andrea Wilder / JAMIE WALLER6-0, 6-1
2025-09-30vs FCC - WoodriffLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Roberts / Shauna Hogg vs Caroline Childers / Loring Woodriff2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLynette Sanford / Michelle Katstra vs Sherry Nedzbala / Dianna Gibson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-25vs Glenmore - EgidiLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Roberts / Shauna Hogg vs Ayla Dugan / Nerissa Rouzer6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-18vs BHSC - SwitzerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Guyton / Shauna Hogg vs Brandy Bridges / Jennifer Farmer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Mary Manley
published
2.80
Kelly Guyton
published
2.72
Lynette Sanford
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Terry Roberts
published
2.54
Michelle Katstra
published
2.54
2.36
Marion Hight
published
2.28
Shauna Hogg
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.07
Beth Kohler
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Sanford + Shauna Hogg151054% games+2.7% vs expected
Mary Manley + Kelly Guyton3251% games−1.4% vs expected
Lynette Sanford + Mary Manley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Manley
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kelly Guyton
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Lynette Sanford
93W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Terry Roberts
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Michelle Katstra
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Christine Eagleson
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Marion Hight
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
Shauna Hogg
40W–97L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Beth Kohler
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.