Teams

A18 4.0M 2 AS Smith

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Summer

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-16vs A18 4.0M 1 PM MalikWon 32
W#1 DoublesBrock Ranney / John Dilyard vs Esa Malik / Trent Binger6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAaron Miedel vs Blake Sours6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Hershberger / Kent Smith vs Roger Boyer / Hassan Malik4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesPaul Self vs Michael Berube6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatt Casto / Max Casto vs Jeffrey Schlak / Joshua Lemerman0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Garrett Ranney
published
3.83
John Dilyard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Brock Ranney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Aaron Miedel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Daniel Tzonev
published 4
3.66
3.58
Paul Self
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.51
Max Casto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Isaac Haynes
published
3.39
Scott Gold
published
Jason Bowen
published
Matt Casto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Hershberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garrett Ranney + Brock Ranney7256% games+4.7% vs expected
Isaac Haynes + Sureshkumar Viswanathan3346% gamesnot enough data
Jason Bowen + John Dilyard134 matchesnot enough data
John Dilyard + Paul Self134 matchesnot enough data
Garrett Ranney + John Dilyard213 matchesnot enough data
John Dilyard + Brock Ranney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Garrett Ranney
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
John Dilyard
79W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.83
4
Brock Ranney
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Aaron Miedel
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Daniel Tzonev
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sureshkumar Viswanathan
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Paul Self
15W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Max Casto
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Isaac Haynes
12W–23L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Scott Gold
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Jason Bowen
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Casto
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Hershberger
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.