Teams

LATA40/Saleeby/SSP

2025 Combo 40 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 8.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.29 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Laura Plyler
published
4.33
Carlynn Musil
published 4.5
Coleen Freeman
published 4.5
4.23
Teri Grote
published
4.18
Ivana Gearheart
published 4.5
4.13
Jessica Gore
published
4.09
Kathryn Sandifer
published
4.09
Donna Saleeby
published 4.5
4.05
Kaylin Hopkins
published
3.99
Melissa Brightbill
published
3.94
Staci Jackson
published
3.88
Caroline King
published 4
3.81
Theresa Stader
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Zivia Kocher
published
3.75
3.71
3.71
Miranda Heaberlin
published
3.67
Sally Keiper
published
3.64
Paula Howker Amick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Sarah Zupon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Jane Rangel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Brightbill + Jessica Gore5263% games+12.0% vs expected
Melissa Brightbill + Miranda Heaberlin27366% games+4.7% vs expected
Paula Howker Amick + Jane Rangel9655% games+1.0% vs expected
Teri Grote + Carlynn Musil5353% games−4.3% vs expected
Donna Saleeby + Zivia Kocher5248% games−11.3% vs expected
Staci Jackson + Kathryn Sandifer3254% gamesnot enough data
Kaylin Hopkins + Theresa Stader314 matchesnot enough data
Jane Rangel + Sarah Zupon134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Plyler
48W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Carlynn Musil
30W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Coleen Freeman
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teri Grote
42W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Ivana Gearheart
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Jessica Gore
62W–19L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
Kathryn Sandifer
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Donna Saleeby
31W–11L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
Kaylin Hopkins
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Melissa Brightbill
91W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Staci Jackson
25W–17L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Caroline King
83W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Theresa Stader
46W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Zivia Kocher
38W–33L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Christina Kaye Huff
19W–31L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Annette McCaffrey
56W–43L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Miranda Heaberlin
84W–28L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Sally Keiper
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Paula Howker Amick
53W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Sarah Zupon
69W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jane Rangel
29W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.