← Teams

SHC-Pacioni

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Andrea Findley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.52
Gregory Hobi
published 3.5
3.44
Andrea Hobi
published 3.5
3.26
Kiersten Lake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
David Visse
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Robyn Hilden
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Scott Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Mike Baker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Jeffrey Fuchs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
—
Mike Booth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results7 ties
2021-11-07Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobyn Hilden / Ken Ackerman vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Zack Hegge6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Baker / Rhonda Baker vs Christina Wright / David Bender6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKiersten Lake / Mike Booth vs Ruth Semon / Troy Johnston7-5, 6-3
2021-11-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Mike Booth vs Susan Suttich / David Hoiland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs vs Nancy Osborne / Gerald Chase6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLillian Lee / David Visse vs Ann Skoog / Jeff Anhaltzer6-3, 6-3
2021-10-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Lisa Mayer vs Andrea Kropp / David Smiley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLillian Lee / Mike Baker vs Josh Belzman / Tamara Phillips6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobyn Hilden / David Visse vs Vicki Blunt / Mark Muckerheide6-4, 6-2
2021-10-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDavid Visse / Robyn Hilden vs Kyle McGovern / Kacie Wise6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMike Baker / Rhonda Baker vs Chris Collins / Parish Burns6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Mayer / Scott Mayer vs Huy Bui / Carly Vendegna6-3, 6-1
2021-10-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Mike Booth vs Xia Yuan / Jianxun Zhang6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs vs Yanchen Qi / Tochukwu George6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRobyn Hilden / Mike Baker vs Emily Qi / Tony Humpage6-2, 6-4
2021-09-24Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs vs Paul Harwood / Lily Looi6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Mayer / Scott Mayer vs Sam Ko / Ellen Hodges6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMike Baker / Rhonda Baker vs William Pinelli / Susan Robblee6-3, 7-6
2021-09-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMike Booth / Kiersten Lake vs Jie Tan / Wiley Zhao6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesScott Mayer / Lisa Mayer vs Jennifer Tran / Kenny Wong6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLillian Lee / Mike Baker vs Lindsey Kahler / Alex Ton6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Andrea Findley
95W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.92
3.5
Gregory Hobi
38W–30L career
0%77%23%
3.52
3.5
Andrea Hobi
63W–46L career
0%92%8%
3.44
3.5
Kiersten Lake
75W–60L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3.5
David Visse
16W–26L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Robyn Hilden
86W–68L career
3%97%0%
3.20
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%55%45%
3.09
3
Mike Baker
47W–91L career
0%96%4%
2.89
0
Jeffrey Fuchs
19W–18L career
not enough data
—
0
Mike Booth
15W–18L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.