Teams

1-MBland-CHTC

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs 3-PHariharan-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Bland / Donovan Khamphasong vs Karan Mehra / Ramandeep Arora6-7, 5-7
2024-10-01vs 4-ROakley-EVWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Bland / Donovan Khamphasong vs Will Johnson / Tom Luben6-3, 6-4
2024-09-28vs 6-JRussell-DFCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Gilliam / Donovan Khamphasong vs Christopher Monroe / Adam Rust6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesGary Glish / David Ward vs Daniel Ennis / Jeff Russell2-6, 5-7
2024-09-24vs 5-MHolt-HSWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / David Ward vs Valdis Stiebris / Dirk Kumashiro6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGary Glish / Franck Seguin vs Michael Holt / Andy Jones6-2, 6-2
2024-09-03vs 3-PHariharan-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesGary Glish / Franck Seguin vs Ramandeep Arora / SRINIVASRAGHAVA SURENDRA1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Chris Stephenson vs Madhusudhanarao Kancharla / Vimal Kumar2-6, 1-6
2024-08-20vs 5-MHolt-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Glish / David Gilliam vs Mark Macdonald / Dirk Kumashiro7-6, 6-0
2024-08-19vs 2-RMcGarrah-HRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / David Gilliam vs Michael Lemanski / Mark Fossum6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGary Glish / Bill Stewart vs Matt Williamson / Andrew Curso4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / David Gilliam vs Jeff Russell / Michael Hannan6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Gary Glish
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Bob Stocking
published 3.5
3.21
Donovan Khamphasong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
David Ward
published 3.5
2.92
Robert Kern
published
2.89
Mark Bland
published
2.71
Bill Stewart
published 3
2.62
Franck Seguin
published 3
David Gilliam
published
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gilliam + Franck Seguin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Glish
141W–124L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Bob Stocking
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donovan Khamphasong
54W–68L career · 10 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
David Ward
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
Robert Kern
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.92
Mark Bland
16W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Bill Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Franck Seguin
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
David Gilliam
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Ryan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.