Teams

4 Avalon Mizrach

2023 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 6.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-27vs 2 Salisbury StembridgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Luchsinger / Steven Edlavitch vs Charles Means / Kyle Fondren5-7, 1-6
2023-08-19vs 3 Belmont StyerWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Grainger / Steven Edlavitch vs Ashleigh Moody / Douglas Morgan6-0, 6-1
2023-08-05vs 6 Willow Oaks CampbellWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrent Belding / Steven Edlavitch vs William Waddell / Alex Burnett6-1, 6-2
2023-07-22vs 2 Salisbury StembridgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurent Beausergent / Steven Edlavitch vs Charles Means / George Pickral3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-07-21vs 5 Acac JonesWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Grainger / Chris Giacchi vs John Kosco / David Robinson7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-15vs 7 MAC CousinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Nicholas Grainger vs Jay Pettit / Aditya Chavan6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Jeremy Kokemor
published
3.58
Nicholas Grainger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Chris Giacchi
published 3.5
3.46
Steven Edlavitch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Brent Belding
published 3.5
3.21
Tim Dolan
published
3.18
Matthew Luchsinger
published
2.99
Glenn Mizrach
published
2.89
Gregory Franklin
published
2.89
Rob Henley
published
2.62
Chris Haberlin
published 3
Laurent Beausergent
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Edlavitch + Nicholas Grainger10165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Kokemor
22W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Nicholas Grainger
108W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Chris Giacchi
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Steven Edlavitch
121W–70L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Brent Belding
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Tim Dolan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Matthew Luchsinger
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Glenn Mizrach
12W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
Gregory Franklin
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
Rob Henley
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Chris Haberlin
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
2.62
Laurent Beausergent
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.