Teams

A.Dec

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-24vs D.MearesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEdward Perkins / Doug Silverman vs Scott Haynes / Joseph Brown7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesStephen Kuss vs Matt Mikula0-6, 4-6
2023-04-17vs T.KovesLost 12
L#1 DoublesEdward Perkins / Stephen Kuss vs Mike Elstob / Michael Hughes5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBrad Aderhold / Doug Silverman vs Kevin Duffy / Philip Robertson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPaul Baggett / Kenneth Nixon vs Andrew Dudeck / Brent Berry0-6, 4-6
2023-04-10vs A.Womack3.5 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesDoug Silverman / Brad Aderhold vs Travis Payne / Ajaz Sadiq6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Baggett / David Jarzemsky vs Scott Zargo / Greg Cox6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-27vs J.HillWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoug Silverman / Stephen Kuss vs Jason Hill / Evan Fultz4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-03-20vs J.HulickiWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Perkins / Doug Silverman vs Spence Huffstetler / Edward Maginnis7-5, 6-3
2023-03-13vs W.EdwardsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEdward Perkins / Doug Silverman vs William Mooney / Howard Critcher6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Ritsema / Paul Baggett vs Sean Krause / Gregory McKenna1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Doug Silverman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
John Markham
published
Brad Aderhold
published 3.5
3.24
Adam Whitesell
published 3.5
3.06
Edward Perkins
published 3.5
3.03
Wes Lippman
published
3.01
Paul Baggett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Stephen Kuss
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Lee Ritsema
published
Kenneth Nixon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Kuss + Doug Silverman4352% games+1.5% vs expected
Stephen Kuss + Paul Baggett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doug Silverman
99W–41L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.61
John Markham
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Brad Aderhold
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Adam Whitesell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Edward Perkins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Wes Lippman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Paul Baggett
30W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Stephen Kuss
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lee Ritsema
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kenneth Nixon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.