Teams

PC-Madams of Mayhem

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-28vs WRAC-SimmonsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Sampson / Julie Hart vs Cindy Bowen-Lorrain / Selena Hernandez1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Wall / Diane Molleson vs Shari Tastad / Julie Stirling4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesOrd McConaghy / ARLENE CUSTER vs Kathleen McIver / Kathy Dinwiddie6-0, 7-6
2024-04-27vs YTC-FlycktLost 03
L#1 DoublesOrd McConaghy / ARLENE CUSTER vs Judi Harris / Shirley Berger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdele Connors / Tammy Deery vs Susan Braun / Joyce Flyckt5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Wall / Diane Molleson vs Susan Bickley / Rhonda Taylor3-6, 2-6
2024-04-26vs EW-PFC-SteinerLost 12
L#1 DoublesOrd McConaghy / ARLENE CUSTER vs Stephanie Butler / Voni Tombari6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Hart / Anne Sampson vs Nancy Bettesworth / Marie Lambert2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAdele Connors / Tammy Deery vs Barbara O'Connor / Pamela Farley7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PFC-Steiner3063775
2YTC-Flyckt2163770
3WRAC-Simmons12451080
4PC-Madams of Mayhem03271495

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Ord McConaghy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Diane Molleson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Tammy Deery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
ARLENE CUSTER
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Deborah Wall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Adele Connors
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Anne Sampson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Hart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ord McConaghy + ARLENE CUSTER14660% games+6.6% vs expected
Julie Hart + Tammy Deery2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ord McConaghy
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Diane Molleson
2W–27L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Tammy Deery
21W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
3
ARLENE CUSTER
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
2.5
Deborah Wall
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Adele Connors
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Anne Sampson
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Hart
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.