Teams

Mo.Sheets18A3.5

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-08vs Sh.Littleton18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Dare / Anne Bailey vs Jennifer Kearney / Holly Atkinson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Newton / Jessica Willetts vs Vinaya Verghese / Laurel Saunders6-2, 6-3
2025-05-03vs Je.Komes183.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesAlicia Dare / Elisabeth Van Order vs Katie Evans / Caroline Moore6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnne Bailey / Brittany Moye vs Alison Sinclair / Donna Misa2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-26vs Er.Wynia18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Van Order / Alicia Dare vs Naomi Rodrigues / Karen Johnston6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrittany Moye / Anne Bailey vs Kendra Allen / Erin Wynia6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Newton / Jessica Willetts vs Joanne Kearney / Katherine King5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-12vs As.McCollum18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittany Moye / Anne Bailey vs Sharon Cole / Sharyn Leaver6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Newton / Jessica Willetts vs Laura Panebianco / Veronica Glass6-1, 6-1
2025-03-29vs Pa.Hankerson18A3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Van Order / Manjula Nagaraja vs CARLA FIELDS / QUEEN HARGROVE6-2, 6-2
2025-03-15vs La.Fye18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Dare / Brittany Moye vs Lily Li / Sara Mazurak6-3, 6-3
2025-03-08vs De.Lape18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Van Order / Ingrid Holscher vs Christine Rowe / Alicia Fitzsimmons6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs La.Triebert18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlicia Dare / Manjula Nagaraja vs Kathy Garnier / Griffin Lamb6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Van Order / Elizabeth Newton vs Anna Jane Franklin / Liza Eaton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrittany Moye / Kerry Ruggieri vs Stephanie Suski / Tiffany Thompson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Alicia Dare
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 46% · published 4
3.75
Stephanie Ferrell
published
3.59
Emily Slater
published
3.58
Leila Thomas
published
3.52
Jessica Willetts
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Elisabeth Van Order
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Brittany Moye
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Elizabeth Newton
published
3.27
Anne Bailey
published 3.5
3.21
Sarah Donovan
published
2.98
Ingrid Holscher
published
2.95
Lindsay Strickland
published
Kerry Ruggieri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leila Thomas + Emily Slater4159% games+7.4% vs expected
Brittany Moye + Leila Thomas303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alicia Dare
76W–29L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Stephanie Ferrell
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Emily Slater
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Leila Thomas
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Jessica Willetts
73W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Elisabeth Van Order
78W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Brittany Moye
56W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Elizabeth Newton
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Anne Bailey
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Donovan
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Ingrid Holscher
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Lindsay Strickland
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Kerry Ruggieri
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.